Soon to decide, the Cologne administrative court, if the Federal office for the protection of the Constitution (BfV) could report the AfD as a “test case”, as an observation object on the stage. A fast-track procedure, the applicant is the AfD. Because of the group General counsel wanted to make a little bit of Wind, he has ordered the Scientific service of the Bundestag’s opinion. It alleges a stigma to the party and to question the legal basis.
It is likely to be a process in which the public attention is inversely proportional to the actual meaning. Firstly, it will raise, no matter who is subject to, appeal. Then the Whole thing goes in front of the higher administrative court. And secondly: What is the changes everything on the result? In principle, hardly anything. The message arrived on an official way in the world; the accompanying material to work with sources and quotes to substantiate the anti-constitutional attitudes, was distributed among the Hand. All are so well informed.
The protection of the Constitution is committed to the truth
Bad? Tend not. With great fanfare, the country offices have taken the last year, the evidence that there were Meetings and conferences, and in the end it had to give any decision. If a member of Parliament or a Journalist would have asked whether the BfV about the AfD collects publicly available information, would have had to answer the office this truthfully: Yes. The competent administrative court of Cologne still of the view that operational work of the BfV is protected from transparency; but in the case of a political party that would have been virtually impossible for them to. Parties are too important. Voters should be allowed to know if the protection of the Constitution takes a whole party to target.
Perhaps it would have been wiser to wait. And maybe you could also dispense with the tried categorizing as a “test case”. However, a Drama of anticipation was not. And that the catalog with the right and radical sins is circulating now on the net, too. Everything in there has already taken place in public. On some of the AfD is possibly even proud of it. According to low, the official classification was as a “classified – only for duty use”.
daily mirror tomorrow location
for Free order
The Problem is not set
It is a dispute for the gallery. The Problem is, not will be in sight once again. Nevertheless, there is an interesting page: the BfV-press release with the “test case” was the official public Relations, most recently, the controversial Twitter post of the Berlin Ruling, which came before the constitutional court. To ensure neutrality, objectivity, and safeguarding of equal opportunities in the political competition. It can’t be wrong, if judges lose again a few words.