“Untidy villas is not a social problem”

“Aftonbladet’s leader board is the independent social democrat.”

“According to the latest statistics from the Swedish Tax agency paid by the state over five billion annually in the rut-deduction. Sweden invests almost as much in subsidising people’s cleaning that you put on urban planning and new housing. There is a lot of money. And every job created by the deduction costs the state over 1.3 million).”

“On the other hand, is the deduction popular. Even if it is in the rikemanskommuner as Danderyd, Lidingö, Vellinge, sweden and Taby you can make the biggest rut-deduction so utilized almost a million swedes the possibility to a deduction in the previous year. Today, there is no party except the Left party who think that the deduction should be abolished. “

“the social democrats have, after a certain amount of agony landed in that rut must be made more fördelningspolitiskt digestible, and in January 2016, saw to the lowering of the ceiling for the deduction. The state pays half of the städräkningen as long as you don’t buy rut-services for more than 50,000 dollars per year. And it is the few who do. Less than 2% of all rut-buyers, to be exact.”

“There are just too many, like the Centre party and the Liberals. In agreement with the social democrats and the green Party has called for the ceiling should trefaldigas. It means that you soon can buy rut-services for 150 000 and get half paid for by the state. A family with two adults pays taxes can purchase housekeeping for 300 000 dollars a year and let the taxpayers account for half of the bill. It requires not only that you have a dirty home, but also to have a very, very high income.”

“How you can to treat obonade parquet floor in miljonärers vräkiga villas as an acute social problem is one of the English liberalism of many communication breakdowns.”

“• if you Want our texts directly in your feed? Click here and like Aftonbladet Leader on Facebook!”