“Sick people go during the day, F- > checkout”
“Slutreplik from Susanne Brandheim about health insurance.”
“This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against.”
“REPLICA. The director-general fails to tackle the grundkritiken; to the social Insurance office (FK)) takes the high-handed decision, leading to long-term people put outside all protection systems. The sick know who makes the decision on the sickness benefit, the conditions for this, and that there are laws that FK follows.”
“the Problem is that the FK’s administrators arbitrarily do anything to reject the sickness benefit for 180 days. The law says that the one who is to ill to work are entitled to compensation. But when are you too sick to work? “
“Well, it determines the FK’s administrators themselves. When the main goal is to save money, because they paid the insurance money has been used to the other, this becomes an ethically provocative authoritarianism that need to be reviewed.”
“In the comments are lots of descriptions of how the FK are playing with and based on both the sick and arbetsbegreppen. The vacuum and the poverty they utförsäkrade ended up in is just because FK has their own ideas about illness and working capacity. In FK’s mission includes the specific responsibility for sick people not to fall between the cracks. “
“My criticism is that they utförsäkrade have fallen between all chairs. That is the very thing.”
“I am not against an authority’s aspiration for the rule of law. I am opposed to FK utförsäkrar people who are too sick to work. The rule of law that is pointed out has three parts. FK to interngranska their own decisions, the turnaround time shall be shortened, and recoveries more efficient (SOU 2018:5). “
“For this to have any significance for the sick who had lost their ability to work so there must also be a legal order that protects the individual against abuse by the authority. Only then can we speak of an adequate rule of law.”
“The insured need now, writes the director-general, an increased understanding of the social conditions. “
“No. This is a critique of precisely these conditions. There will not be any increased understanding of the current management of the chronically ill. There must be a change. Simply because people go under.”
“nSusanne Brandheim, phd in social work.”
“n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook.”
“the Article is a slutreplik. Read the full the debate here:”
