the Benefit of reading Today’s News is that you can go back to take part of the Carl Tham call the ”biased reportage”. You should then find that it is about conventional journalism that DN is ongoing to highlight the situation of the country’s most important cultural institutions, including the royal dramatic theatre. One of the latest examples is an interview with actor Julia Dufvenius, who openly told me about how she been provided with personal protection equipment in order to dare to take themselves to and from his work on one of the Dramatic scenes. Whether this is to be regarded as ”hysterically speaking” leaves I to the reader to judge.
the problems at the royal dramatic theatre is a loss to the Swedish cultural life and to the theatre’s board of directors carries on a great responsibility for this. However, not in the way that he describes. If the royal Dramatic theatre’s board of directors had intervened earlier in the untenable situation had Eirik Stubøs imperative qualities as an artistic director able to continue to be taken advantage of, also under reasonable working conditions for all involved. It had ultimately been the best for the national stage and its audience.
Read more: Carl Tham: the Board gave in to the mediemobben when you let Stubø go
Read more: the royal dramatic theatre director Eirik Stubø leaving his post
Read more: Julia Dufvenius: ”I got the protection to and from the stage at the royal dramatic theatre”
Read more: Director: ”the royal dramatic theatre sjukskrev me even though I was healthy.”