At the 6. November, the as Carlos in Switzerland known Brian was convicted of attempted grievous bodily harm and other offences, to imprisonment for a term of four years and nine months. In addition, the court ordered an in-patient therapeutic measure.
Hansueli Gürber, who was at the time of the famous special settings in the years 2012/13, for Brian, the competent youth attorney, did not want to comment on the request for judgment. Well, two weeks later, the 68-Year-old from holt, in a lengthy Interview with the “Switzerland on the weekend” from CH Media to a sweeping blow.
Want to create transparency to retain
He had “fed up”, the whole story no longer. It was “incredible that the whole of Zurich’s political scene know, what at that time is expired. But keep all tight.” Because he’ll be addressed in the context of the current process permanently on the events of 2013, he decided “that it is best to create transparency”.
the events in The late summer of 2013, in the shortest version: In a report broadcast by SRF, the portrayed actually, Hansueli Gürber, it was announced that a young offender is on a 22000 francs expensive special setting, in which the perpetrators of violence – as in the Film, was also Thai Boxing courses were funded.
“Social-mania!” was the headline in the “view” and started a media avalanche. Only ten days later, justice Director Earl Martin and the chief youth Prosecutor Marcel giants of the Public agreed. They laid a 23-page report on the youth criminal enforcement procedures in the case of the 17-year-olds, who had already been at the time, meadows eight times in prison, five times in a closed Institution, and seven times in a open device.
special setting was known
What outraged Hansueli Gürber, six years later? Everyone would have known that it is given this special setting, and how much it had cost. Because of the regularly scheduled meetings, at which incumbent giants took part, he is reported “in detail about the case”. Nevertheless, “the impression that I would have secretly traded”.
this is how it sounded in the press reports. He had therefore asked for a debate with the giant, justice Director Martin Graf, as well as the then General Secretary and asked, “is that you communicate clearly that I had not acted secretly”. All the three had but just laughing “uproariously” and said: “we are not doing That for sure.”
Specifically, Gürber claimed in an Interview, Department head, giant have said the former justice Director Graf, “I would have secretly traded. Because count is a legal layman, he believed this, actually”.
“The allegations did not vote”
And also in another connection fell Gürber, apparently, “from the clouds”: In a hearing, he pointed out that the bills of the special settings “were always over the top youth advocacy”. Giant, the sass, not replied I: “But on top of my table.”
“We knew that there was the Setting. We knew the total amount. It worked but with flat-rate.”Marcel giants,
senior youth advocate
lied to a Department head, the giant to his superiors? “The allegations are not true,” said Marcel giants, on request of this newspaper. In the Rest of the operations had been dealt with six years ago, in numerous committees and Supervisory committees in Detail. “There is nothing to be attached to.” Gürbers Version of that giant of justice Director Graf informed about the responsibilities of wrong, is at least questionable.
In a video interview, which took place on the occasion of the media conference ten days after the Busted of the “Social madness,” said the giant, “We (knew the top youth advocacy) that there is the Setting. We knew the total amount.” The configuration of the Settings he had not been informed.
Martin Graf is silent
For the Film itself, specifically the participation of Brian, takes Gürber, however, the responsibility. Giant says that he was informed about the Film, but not on the choice of the case study.
Martin Graf Brings light into the Dark? No. In the “Switzerland on the weekend,” he is quoted with the sentence: “the giant was not informed from my point of view really well on the case.” To the “Sunday newspaper” said Graf, the quote was not authorized. Further, he no longer external to the case.
Appeal in criminal proceedings
To Brian himself has returned, until today, no peace: a judicial procedure is in progress due to various offences which he should have behind bars committed. The district court of Dielsdorf has sentenced Brian to imprisonment for a term of four years and nine months, suspended in favor of a stationary therapy. As the court informed today, has not logged in only Brian, but also the Prosecutor’s office appealed.
Created: 25.11.2019, 11:52 PM
