“Don’t read it here, Annika Strandhäll”
“this is hatarnas targets”
“Aftonbladet’s leader board is the independent social democrat.”
“I hope that Annika Strandhäll and Annie Lööf’s not reading this text. I will highlight a few examples of the purposeful, targeted, sexual and threatening messages against women in politics, who gets it to turn in the belly of me. But I intend to do it to show how bad it is. The events of recent days have made it even more urgent to talk about.nCenterledaren Annie Lööf to mark the second anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Drottninggatan, and did it with a picture of a flower displays. Her post was followed by a perfect storm of hatred, one part pure intimidation.”
“”the Next truck is paxad for you Annie.”n”You should be burned at the stake for what you really accomplished.”n”given on the policies you stand for had you been able to run the truck itself. Their blood is on YOUR hands.”nAnnie Lööf said: “To all of you who write horrible comments here in this thread. Now know I that ye do it no matter if I write that the weather is nice or if we are betting on entrepreneurship. But a tweet like this, to honor and remember the victims. Indecent.””
“Women and black targets”
“social insurance Annika Strandhäll went in to support the centerledaren, whereupon the crowds of people in the comments defended the hatred.nKvinnor and blacks are the specific targets for näthat, to begin with. It is directed against women in the public sphere, but also ordinary women and girls in front of a view can be exposed to huge amounts of hatred.nTidningen The Guardian analysed 70 million nätkommentarer on its site, and focused particularly on those who become the blockade for inappropriate posts. It was found that ”articles written by women more attracted insults and derogatory reviews than articles written by men”. The two male columnists who suffered most had dark skin.nHatet thrive more in certain online forums. Female journalists and politicians get a 30 second receive abusive messages on Twitter, according to a survey of 280 000 posts, conducted by Amnesty and teknikbolaget Elements AI.”
“The hatred that is directed against women that takes place focuses often on appearance, gender, sexuality, it threatens and strikes at the very most private.”
“Terribly grave post”
“I did a review of the social insurance Annika Strandhälls social media. She is a minister who meets the rare very hat. Relevant criticism is mixed up with terribly serious post. This happens even when she’s writing the most innocuous things. The purpose is obvious: it should be creepy and scary to even make a post.nAnnika Strandhäll writes: “Today it is Friday. Wish you all a pleasant evening!”nEn twittrare writes: “Go home and get a pinch so that you will be a little kinder” while another writes: “NO one wants to fuck Strandhäll, gokväll!”nAnnika Strandhäll sharing an article, and writes: “Very good and worth reading posts in the debate of two wise gentlemen. “Januariavtalet does not reduce the growing inequalities in society”. Response from a twittrare: “Must be incredibly arousing to feel the Per Gyllenhammar gubbkuk penetrate in the genital area? For his wife is no whore?””
“do not confuse hatred with criticism”
“Hatinlägg shall not in any way be mixed up with criticism, which a defender of this påhoppen often do. It is reasonable to write that you are angry over the policies, you can, of course, require someone to take responsibility, even require that the person should resign. “
“But hatred has an agenda. We also see that social media reward it. Facebook benefit, for example, posts with strong emotional content, the things that make you pissed. It is one of the reasons that right-wing populist sites have been able to grow exponentially on Facebook.it is not reasonable to write that “the Next truck is paxad for you” or calling anyone a whore. The comments section reveals an abhorrent view of women, make the net a scary place and is basically a threat to democracy. What is the purpose? Of course, to get the female politician to back down, to silence, to be scared. It can influence whether women in general will like to venture into politics.nto Aftonbladet says Annika Strandhäll about their presence in social media: “from time to time I have wondered if it is worth to be left behind. But at the same time, it is just what some of these people want. They want to silence strong voices that they dislike.”nRättsväsendet has been too toothless against this kind of violation, even if we have been a number of judgments, so is the abuse that burst on the slopes. The more judgments, the clearer the mark the society that the web is not a lawless country.”
“Here’s a brief action plan to the next time you see the people affected by this type of post:nSäg from.nTystnaden is hatarens best friend.”
