At the end of the debate could Grin, Stefan Feldmann (SP, type) a malicious, and the phrase “yeah, Well, “Dead on Arrival”, we say” don’t resist. “Dead on Arrival” is called in the electronics industry, devices that arrive to function for the customer.
Feldmann has referred his testimony to a parliamentary Initiative by Nina Fehr Düsel ( SVP , Küsnacht). They demanded that the occupied houses within 72 hours, according to a criminal complaint for trespassing by the police vacated. SVP, FDP, CVP, BDP and the EDU supported the project yesterday on a provisional basis.
a year ago this would have been an almost certain guarantee that the project will later be referred definitely. But from the beginning of may, the member of the Parliament is presented differently composed, and the majority have then with SP, GLP, Green, AL, and EPP, those parties that voted yesterday against the Initiative. In the second reading in a couple of months, the request should therefore be rejected.
“the risk for police officers”
the opponents of The parliamentary Initiative could be critical to the proponents. “Who says Yes to a fixed clearance period, the knowledge is endangered a number of occasions, our policemen and deliberately the inside,” said Markus Schaaf (EPP, cell). Any deadline, no matter how long, is a massive intervention into the police tactics.
Silvia Rigoni (Green, Zurich) accused the supporters, they wanted to ruthlessly enforce the interests of property owners. Raphael Steiner (SP, Winterthur, Switzerland) reminded that the Actions of the state ratio should be moderate. In addition, a clearance period would be a rarity in the law: “There is no time limit as to when the police must be at the scene of a break-in, no deadline for Intervention in the case of offences of Violence, but a time limit for the spaces occupied real estate?”
supporters, however, pointed out that the company was not a “law-free” spaces tolerate. Marc Bourgeois (FDP, Zurich) described insistently, against which provisions of a squatter, allegedly, the construction is not violated: for real, to talk about the hospitality law, noise regulations, “of trespassing in the first place”.
The Initiative is an attack not prohibited in the police tactics. Therefore, the addition of am as “respecting the proportionality and the security”. Basically, it is only a question that the police should spaces in the city of Zurich – other than today – and must, if the owner of the house could boast neither a demolition permit, a redevelopment of the property have planned. Unlike with a period that doesn’t go, apparently.
Benedikt Hofmann (SVP, Zurich), read the vote of the absent Nina Fehr Düsel, and left no doubt as to who is the actual addressee of the Initiative: “The city of Zurich to squatters a false tolerance.”
“Lex”
Also that was for the opponent not the Argument. Laura Huonker (AL, Zurich) complained: “no Matter what dress, push a Lex is in Zurich. This is tiring.” Huonker alluded to the fact that Nina Fehr had submitted the parliamentary Initiative, a Motion in which they asked for an eviction within 48 hours. As a defeat in the Council became evident, after she pushed the watered-down Initiative. Their justification: It had to happen, otherwise they would Mr of the Problem.
In most occupations there are no problems, countered the Green Silvia Rigoni; the allegation that Zurich will not tolerate lawless areas, is absurd: “Today, most of the tamper to finish with the property owners to use the loan contract.” In fact, most of the roughly thirty to fifty occupied houses ready-to-Zurich – the number varies constantly with little difficulty. There are exceptions, such as the cooking Area, where it came to noise complaints from the neighbors. However, yesterday discussed the Initiative would have changed, of all things, in this case, The cooking Area belongs to the city, and they would have probably refunded hardly a complaint against the squatters.
today’s law practice in the city of Zurich to squatters, by the way, introduced some thirty years ago, a bourgeois-dominated city Council. At the time, squatters and the police fought a small war with the occupation, eviction and re-occupation. The situation calmed down when the city decided to let houses only rooms, if within a reasonable period of time is to be expected with a demolition or repurposing.
(editing Tamedia)
Created: 08.04.2019, 21:42 PM
