The input values given to the integrationskommission as Ulf Kristersson presents breathe assimilation policy taken from the time before 1975 and very reminiscent of other conservative parties the new craze of the homogenous welfare state. To the current integration policy has failed does not mean that a soon to be 50 year old vision of integration is the solution for the future.
Ulf Kristersson parts simplified up those who immigrated to Sweden in two categories: those who want to become part of the society and those who do not want it. Then be directed, in principle, all the attention and debate on the later group, on the fully independent churches and hedersförtryck. Major societal challenges, of course, must be dealt with. But, as so often, one forgets the fact that the vast majority who come to Sweden wanted nothing more than to be a part of the society they come to, to contribute through work and take part of the rights and freedoms and the democracy that Sweden offers.
but the party believes that the failure of the integration more than anything else depends on the individual’s unwillingness to become a part of society, and that political reforms must overcome the reluctance. We believe that it is an incorrect view of the basic problem and at the same time, an over-reliance on political reforms.
the Conservatives ‘ new” integration policy, shows with all desirable clarity that the party believes that the failure of the integration more than anything else depends on the individual’s unwillingness to become a part of society, and that political reforms must overcome the reluctance. We believe that it is an incorrect view of the basic problem and at the same time, an over-reliance on political reforms.
We believe also that the real failure is that the large majority of immigrants who want to become a part of the community not be given the chance to be there. Society has gradually become more closed and exclusionary towards those who did not born here. It is a great betrayal of both individuals and the whole society, then this involuntary exclusion are a source of great human suffering and high costs for society.
the Failure of integration is not just about the lack of political reforms, but at least as much about the lack of meetings between people who are established in society and those who want to be there.
the Failure of integration is not just about the lack of political reforms, but at least as much about the lack of meetings between people who are established in society and those who want to be there.
in everyday life, as the conditions for successful integration are formed. In opportunity to practice English with someone who speak the language fully, in the possibility to take part of the culture, traditions and understand the community, in the ability to build up the network of contacts in the network era, the closest is a prerequisite for being able to get a job, and in the ability to build understanding and trust to each other.
We already established in the society therefore has a critical role in that new people should be allowed to take part of the society. That is why integration is very much a two-way process. If you do not understand this simple but at the same time absolutely fundamental dimension in order to solve the integrationsutmaningen risk of all the reforms, how praiseworthy they may be, only contribute to more segregation.