Before the ministerial meeting in Brussels last week decided the parliamentary committee on EU mentioned that Sweden would vote with the other EU countries, whose decisions, after a lengthy meeting was to meet the Uk’s desire to push back his decision date to leave the EU. A blankröst had more inconsistent with Swedish interests, and indirectly support the brits who villa remain in the EU.
the WTO was formed in 1955. Since then, it has worked untiringly to create rules for trade relations between the countries of the world. Today is the 164 pieces, about 12 countries outside of the and just as plenty is perhaps, whereas what the WTO succeeded over 64 years get in the EUROPEAN circuit and also by our government grade disaster.
If the Uk is shortly to leave the EUROPEAN union and instead adopt the rules of the WTO are portrayed as crashing out of the community. And we all know that the word crash does not mean something positive.
with the security surrounding the british decision to leave the EU.
51.9 percent voted to leave, 48.1% wanted to remain within the community.
the Uk’s decision to hold a referendum on withdrawal from the EU, it was decided by the previous prime minister, David Cameron. Cause a permanent disagreement within his party Tory, the English right wing, about the membership. Cameron was sure that the referendum would silence those who wanted to leave the EU.
It is known that the election campaign led to lack of arguments. The consequences of leaving the EU were drowned by the happiness to avoid the illegal immigration across the English channel from the EUROPEAN country of France. After the referendum, the resignation of Cameron as prime minister and was succeeded by his interior minister Theresa May.
We also know that the Uk and Sweden often support each other when it comes to votes in the EU. United kingdom in the EUROPEAN union to the Swedish opinions to gain a hearing. The british are perhaps Sweden’s ”only friend” in the EU. Now we run the risk of becoming more isolated, to put forward our arguments.
the Uk is a major american trading partner. The Swedish companies concerned that the british should leave the EU. The country comes in seventh place with an import of Swedish goods on the 82 billion (2018), after countries like Germany, Norway, Finland, Denmark, the USA and the Netherlands.
Against the background of the EU is the board’s and the Swedish government’s decision to vote in order to facilitate the Uk’s exit from the EU difficult to understand. Prime minister Stefan Löfven (S) should instead be voted for the british will be prevented to leave the EUROPEAN union. It should more be in line with what both the Swedish people as the Swedish companies desire. At least the prime minister has broken through to blankrösta. It had at least created a debate.
the Swedish government Brexit-the argument that it would be a ”disaster” if the Uk would crash out of the EU and switch to the to trade with the world in accordance with WTO rules.
instead of with a blankröst and indirectly support the 48.1% of the british voted to stay in the EU choose Sweden’s social democrat prime minister to support the Tory party, the party that, under the Margaret Thatcher’s time as prime minister crumbled apart the british trade unions. How history-less must a prime minister be?
the British have never really embraced the EUROPEAN union. They have since the entry had a derogation. The fight they are now again.
deals with the EUROPEAN union in proven agreement. Brexitanhängarna requires something different, something better – the rules that should at least stop the seekers from the EU countries and the rest of the world.
at the same time knäar their health care, just like the Swedish, in the absence of labor. You need the right people, which often comes from the outside. But this fact was never an argument for the referendum.
The british view, ”fog over channel – continent isolated ”, still lives – but must be embraced by our EU affairs and the prime minister?
