Royalty Positiekledij? No, there does Meghan Markle. The wife of prince Harry, meanwhile, turns up very pregnant, but at her wardrobe you will not notice: she still wears Dior, Valentino and high Manolo Blahniks as usual. In zwangerschapswinkels is the phenomenon is known: “Sometimes come here to women who are almost proud to say:” I’m already six months away and still ordinary clothes to wear!'” Or how mothers balance between vanity and comfort.
That was to be expected, of course, that the British press every outfit of the now eight months pregnant Meghan would comment on it. And it must be said, gorgeous seems to be the 37-year-old through the day whistling. But if zwangerschapsmerken thought that their sales a boost would get, should they that hope in the meantime deleted: one dress from the pregnancy line of H&M carried them (that, indeed, immediately sold out), and one of the zwangerschapsmerk Hatch, but for the rest it is ‘just’ Givenchy or Stella McCartney – often a little changed by kleermaaksters of the court.
Sexy? Don’t need
Also in our country, it is striking how there is a certain pudeur around the concept of “zwangerschapskledij’ depends. When Astrid Coppens (formerly known as Astrid Bryan) this week in our country, her collection for ZEB came to propose, she did that with a ball belly, but also with ordinary ready-to-wear and high heels: “I do not even have reservepaar”, she noted. “It needs to succeed in a full evening of stylish to stay.” Business as usual, which is different from the current generation of mothers still say, the 80’s, when pregnant women have high Demis Roussos-content. To return to Great Britain: princess Diana, however, a particularly stylish woman, wore dresses which rested two princesses fit. Comfort and freedom of movement were paramount. Sexy? Didn’t have to.