Today is Friday again climate strike: students walk on the street, because you are worried about the climate. All Gugus?
Yes. If the children of the policy in the right direction, not something wrong. We observe an Infantilization. The teachers encourage the children to truancy and Demos indoctrinate, would not even have been in my time among the most progressive of 68 teachers. I don’t mind if you addressed the climate change in the school, on the contrary, but please, in the classroom, with different opinions.

deny as a politician of the responsibility, the Problem of the climate crisis into the Private. You could just as well say: Why do we need the AHV? To save everyone myself.
Nothing against saving and financial responsibility! The issue of climate I take very seriously. Therefore, I place myself with in-depth arguments in the “world week” against this political mass trance that overwhelms us at the moment.

With its negation, of the human climate change caused you to stand in Opposition to the climate science. Self-doubt will never get?
I simply consider the undisputed facts. Since the end of the little ice age around 1860 the world has warmed the climate by just one degree. It gave the story much greater fluctuations. Half of the increase happened between 1910 and 1940, although the CO2 content was much lower than it is today. Then it cooled again, despite more and more CO2. As hot as it was in the Thirties, documented, for example, John Steinbeck in his classic “The Grapes of Wrath”, as you know, as a culture editor.

John Steinbeck in honour, but of the ten warmest years since the beginning of the Measurement nine in 2005 or later. The trend is obvious.
she Is the? The IPCC has tick models for each climate forecast, if you at the lottery all the Numbers. Six guaranteed. The dramatic forecasts, the authority has not occurred. If, however, science makes false predictions, it is not a science. This is not to say that Richard Lindzen, a leading meteorologist in Boston says.

Lindzen took proven money from the coal lobby.
And now? All are paid, the climate-Horsemen from the state. The decisive factor is the quality of the results. As an interested layman, I am aware that the gospel of climate-prophet is disputed by reputable scientists like Lindzen, while the policy is in the term, to understand this climate hysteria as an absolute truth.

Lindzen is an academic geek. What is in your opinion wrong with the huge bevy of Climate scientists, for the man-climate change, fact made? A conspiracy or what?
to Err is human. (laughs) And the climate policy is a huge business, as the teachers hanging chairs, careers, entire industries on it. We feel like this is all politicized. “Skepticism” is a dirty word on the subject of climate. This skepticism is the most important scientific virtue. Dangerous, is that the state intervenes heavily in our economy and energy supply. Working with 30-year scenarios and longer. Because the Soviets with their 5-year-plans were modest.

But if it is now even hotter, if they had no joy, is it?
Why not? Climate change there have always been, you have to adjust to the consequences. In some places, it’s a disaster, to others a blessing. Man believes today that he was, so to speak, in the centre of the universe, of creation. Even the climate of this mysterious multi-factor system should only be dependent on man. This is presumption, religious delusion, self-deification.

There is no public need for action regarding the climate crisis?
no. The state should hold back, remain modest. I have nothing against better energy sources and new technologies, but you should rely on the innovation power of the companies and the private sector. The state of the climate collective is much more dangerous than climate change.

your personal CO2 footprint you are not interested in?
to Hear you with this CO2 demonization! Thanks to the CO2 the green to grow for thirty years, land heavily on the earth. I have the CO2 massive pent-up demand. I’ve only been driving ten years, car.

In the Tamedia-survey climate change and environmental destruction is to place three of the most pressing issues. The people’s party seems to be a concern of the people to disregard and to cultivate, instead, a Dandy-attitude. A little ridicule, a little cynicism, a lot of indifference.
nonsense. I’m not for the destruction of the environment. But as a Journalist it is my job, the people in error, thinking gaps and repressed facts. When it comes to climate, we have a Hype. I speak of a new sun religion, a kind of political Trance. It is our duty as citizens is to give against tax. The debate is dangerously one-sided.

Coming soon to the “nuclear turn” of the SVP? The requirement to make the nuclear phase-out, undo, and to build a new NUCLEAR power plant?
We have no romantic relationship to nuclear energy. But we want a long term secure supply of electricity that is independent from abroad. With our head-free energy revolution, we will go to the wall, and Switzerland from abroad.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 15.03.2019, 17:20 PM