The ARD has appointed the linguist Elisabeth Wehling, a manual, to answer the question of how you can improve your Image. The manual cost 120000 euros fee money and should remain secret. Wehling advises, and I quote, “staff of the ARD” to call private ending as often as possible “media capitalist locusts”. Animal avoid comparisons, decency reasons, I always thought. The locusts, according to the Handbook, the practice of “profit-censorship”. So great series like “4 Blocks”, “Jerks” or “Modern Family arise, however,”. I think I’m a for-profit censorship.
payment unwilling to be referred to as a “democracy”
Instead of just “ARD” to say “our common, free radio,” or “our common radio capital”, resulting in the Audience but no financial claims should be derived. This capital you can stand out Yes anything. The licence fee should be renamed according to the manual, in “radio participation”. You should be proud to participate. For Insolvent you should use “democracy” or “disloyal”. Whoever sees in us something critical that proves this lack of democracy, the suitability of a shabby character, got it? The main Passage goes like this: “The ARD is one of us, with us and for us. The ARD exists solely for us. We are you.“
For me, does this sound like the founding document of a new sect. You could take it every two hours in the program, slow, sung by a beautiful Alto voice and accompanied by strings, no: String. Then the camera pans to the image of a grasshopper with the head of the “jungle camp”-moderator Sonja Zietlow. This only as food for thought! The General Secretary of the ARD said that the manual contained “food for thought”.
words are coined, others wiped off the map
The language has become the battlefield of a cultural fight, elsewhere. Words are coined, which, according to George Orwell blades, for example, “we are you”, other words are erased. In France, for example, may no longer be in school forms for a couple of days of “father” and “mother” of the speech, only to “parent 1 and 2”. The guaranteed here as well. Same-sex parents should not feel excluded. I can understand why. But why not the Solomon solution, “mother/parent 1”?
Feel the goats themselves discriminated against?
Now, many fathers and mothers feel naturally excluded, and you are angry. First, it was said: “We want to be in the language of the visible.” This is happening more and more. Now, however, it is said: “ye shall be invisible.” Mother ‘ is a discriminatory word? Discrimination I kidney goat, if I call a sheep a sheep? How about instead of “Grass”?