people complain a part that you refer to the Left party and The sweden democrats as ”ytterlighetspartier” and trying to keep them both away from political influence. But in few areas has the epithet been more relevant than in the EU-issue. While the rest of the parliament slowly jämkat together to a kind of consensus – the union is far from perfect but it is the best tool we have for creating peace, stability and prosperity in our part of the world – has V and SD stubbornly held up.
swung first. The reason is not difficult to figure out: the SD has a single väljarvinnande political opinion, minimal immigration, and everything else revolves around it. We are now approaching M and KD, then replace The smooth foot in the EU-issue.
With the Left, it is different. Party history is one long parade of condemnation of the youth democracy project EUROPEAN union.
When Europe’s democracies sought to come closer to each other to prevent more wars and increase trade and interaction chose the vänsterpartister a different path. They continued to tenderly nurture relationships to the Soviet union and its satellite states. For these dictatorships were the EU and Nato dödsfienderna.
If something is beneficial for companies and private owners, there must by definition be bad for the V.
the EU agreed on democracy and human rights and tore down barriers. While socialism often boasts to be an internationalism was the Left party, and previous VPK, so rigid against the most successful internationalist project the world has ever known.
Why? For that they have always seen the EU as a capitalist tower of babel. If something is beneficial for companies and private owners must, by definition, be bad.
even the Left party changed its opinion. During the weekend the EU-valkonferens was decided to no longer pursue the issue of an exit.
the Decision was taken after a long debate, in which many of the views are recognized, from the left party political tradition. ”People die out at sea for that the EU has an inhumane refugee policy, the salaries dumped, workers are pitted against each other, racism is increasing”, said, for example, Ana Süssner Rubin, candidate to the EUROPEAN parliament, to the TT.
But the people flee to their home countries is characterized by that which is the EU’s antithesis –lack of freedom, secrecy, repression. The salaries to be dumped and the workers are sucked out, in particular in countries far outside Europe. Racism may increase the situation, particularly in Hungary, terrifying – but motvapnet is not that Sweden pull away and leave the resistance to others.
with respect to developments within the European union. There will always to make. The story is not linear. The era to come, the era disappear, vänstervågor follow högervågors time. At any given time there will be plenty of people who think that the Brussels pointing in crazy directions.
today, it is The sweden democrats which, together with similar parties in the union in fresh air and see an opportunity to högerpopulisera the EU. All the more reason for opponents of the development to keep in, to argue, to sit steadily in the forums where decisions are taken.
it will seriously compare the Europe of today with the 1970s and 80s to become the closest dazzled by the improvements. We can’t go out on our own continent. But we can influence it, the best of your ability.
