Lagdommer Kristel Heyerdahl has spent a great deal of rettsdagen in the day to go through the rettsbelæringen. Where she went through what evidence she believes the jury should emphasize and in what order she thinks they should be considered.
In addition, she went specifically on cases that have already been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
At 13 was the right set, and the jury withdrew to consider of Eirik Jensen is guilty or not of complicity to Gjermund cappelen in his narkotikainnførsel and gross corruption. Heyerdahl urged the jury to take time. It is thus expected that it may take a few days before the judgment falls.
Follow Dagbladet live-studio from right here.
PROCESS: Even if Jensen is today known innocent by the jury, it can be a long process before he is completely exonerated. Video: Nicolai Delebekk Show more – Agree with Heyerdahl
Defender John Christian Fire says to Dagbladet after the end of the rettsdag that he is satisfied with Heyerdahl rettsbelæring. It is a particular thing he draws.
Heyerdahl said during the rettsbelæringen that the jury must be convinced that Cappelen is guilty of a concrete importation of drugs.
the Jury must find it proved that Eirik Jensen has contributed to a specific importation. The district court went the opposite way here. They thought it was enough that he had knowledge about the business, but not intervened. This told Heyerdahl that was not enough, ” says Fire.
I mean rettsbelæringen was correct and thorough, he adds.
drawing lots to decide Jensen’s fate – and Now we have to wait
the Fire points out that Jensen could potentially run the risk of sitting in prison for life. Jensen himself has repeatedly stated that he is fighting for his own life.
the Newspaper got a quick word with Eric Jensen when he left the court around the clock 13. When he said that he should go home and wait for adjudication.
Also the Fire says that the only thing they can now do is to wait on the jury’s verdict.
– Fear the Jensen to be arrested on the spot if he gets convicted?
– He sees all possibilities, is prepared for everything, but hope to be found innocent, ” says the Fire.
Jensen-the case is well known that the second last jury. Questions about the Fire, think this has significance for the ruling, he says that he has confidence that the jury considers the case conscientiously.
Now life can be all over the Comment Can be shared on a lie
Heyerdahl spent a lot of time in the rettsbelæringen to go through how the law considers tiltalepunktene, for contribution to the hasjinnførsel and gross corruption.
She pointed out that, among other things, that it is not of importance whether Jensen actually had the ability to shield cappelen in his business, it keeps that it is proven that he has the mental contributed.
It means that Jensen can be convicted for having lied to Cappelen that he could shield between the drug business.
– Yes, it’s true. It is also correct according to the law, ” says forvarer the Fire.
– Jensen or Cappelen speak false
