A little more than 100 pages of lever attempts to show that Merkel did not act so free of ideology, how it is said. Accordingly, they followed up today with a neo-liberal Agenda, in the interests of the economy are a priority. Lever engages from the left. His expectation of the state is high, in terms of the production of justice. the Review by Nico Fried Nico Fried
Nico Fried, since 2007, the SZ-Parliamentary office in Berlin. Together with his colleagues he reported on the people and events in the Chancellery, the ministries, the Parliament and other places where policy is made. The native of Ulm since 1996 she lives in the capital, where he worked for four years for the Berliner Zeitung. 2000 peace came to the süddeutsche Zeitung, and reported to the Parliament editorial on German foreign policy, the former PDS, and later on the Green. In 2004, he took over the journalistic observation of the SPD, three years later, the office line. Nico Fried, born in 1966, studied in Munich and Hamburg in political science and a master of arts complete.
on Twitter, send an E-Mail
It hasn’t even been three months since Angela Merkel announced their entry into the exit – a book is on your balance sheet as a Chancellor. Stephan Hebel has written it, a writer for the Frankfurter Rundschau and the German radio. He was the fastest, puts the book under the suspicion of inappropriate hustle and bustle, however, belongs to the author, for many years the most prominent critics of the economic and social policy, Gerhard schröder’s and Angela Merkel’s. The Foundation has poured levers over the years, “Merkel’s balance sheet and legacy of a chancellorship” is also a book that become the Expansion of its journalistic activities.
In a little more than 100 pages of lever attempts to show that Merkel did not act so free of ideology, as it is said, but until today, a neo-liberal Agenda pursued in the interests of the economy are a priority. Worse still, the rate is, however, Merkel had helped to contribute to schröder’s Agenda-politics as well as in the years of her chancellorship largely to a split in the society, through their refugee policy is not caused, but only exacerbated, accelerated, and disclosed.
lever engages from the left. His expectation of the state is high, as for the Manufacture of justice as well as the radical nature of the instruments. Nevertheless, he has not written an angry polemic, but a trenchant and often the consideration sought balance. Especially to Merkel’s social policy, it is actually a Although but book.
Stephan lever: Merkel. The balance sheet and the legacy of a chancellorship. Westend Verlag, Frankfurt 2019. 128 Pages, 14 Euros. E-Book: 9,99 Euro.
(photo: )
The “While” refers to undeniably Positive, for example, the decline in the number of unemployed, the rise in the employment or the family’s political progress. The “But” then examines the Details of a growing low-wage sector, the social impact of the Hartz IV program or the limits of the political ambitions of Merkel. Some shortcomings are obvious, some of the Figures depressing, the conclusions are quite controversial, but as an impetus for discussion.
would not have harmed A to the non-Political border by the end of the unbalance
the book, if leverage would have been limited to the Social and economic policy. His analyses of Foreign or domestic policy, for example, arg from falling superficial. Since the analyst is leaving the field to often the editorial writer.
The biggest shortcoming, however, is that the lever presents his charge that Merkel could have done more, if she had only wanted to, hardly any domestic political constraints, European Resistors and the responsibility of other actors. Here, the willingness to balance ends. In terms of focusing on the Political, which he demands in dealing with Merkel, has a lever so that even in this point a to the non-Political border by the end of the unbalance.
