The sexual relationship must have begun in the autumn of 2017, and was shortly thereafter when the boy told another employee on the property.
According to the 16-year-old was the woman, who is 45 years of age, who took the initiative and he has stated that he attended reluctantly and was afraid of what would happen if he said no.
and claims that it was the 16-year-old who took the initiative to sex.
the district Court judge that 16-year-old was in an obvious position of dependence to the woman, and it doesn’t matter if he participated willingly or not. The woman convicted of sexually have taken advantage of a person in a position of dependency. The judgment has been appealed.
