The entire exercise as the head captain, who was the lieutenant in charge was rejected.A glimpse of syndalenin in care on 16.12.2015 held at the firearms training died in training participated in officer students. Sampo Korhonen
the Helsinki court of appeal has given its ruling Syndalenin firearm training in accident case.
a glimpse of syndalenin in care on 16.12.2015 held at the firearms training died in training participated in officer students.
the Helsinki court of appeal sentenced today, Thursday, by solution, condemned the fighting the shooting the leader of the first lieutenant and became the operations supervisor acted as a boatswain’s favor crime and manslaughter. The entire exercise as the head captain, who was the lieutenant in charge was rejected.
the shooting as the director served as a first lieutenant wasn’t against her to contend with have been careful provisions taken care of adequately the fact that the students were practicing combat shooting in the dark before the hard contribution to the phase. A first lieutenant was considered to have committed a service offence. The district court had previously condemned by the first lieutenant negligent service offence.
to become operations supervisor acted as a boatswain’s watch was left without ensuring that the bunch certainly knew how to in every respect correct and safe execution. The court of appeal also considered him guilty of the service offence, when the district court had condemned him to the negligent service offence.
As the first lieutenant and the boatswain were not complied with it, the diligence of the shooting of the security relationship, which they had been required, and military death could keep shooting circumstances, taking into account the unforeseeable, the court of appeal considered the district court their guilty also of involuntary manslaughter.
One of the charges was dismissed
the Exercise director captain, who was lieutenant with regard to the court of appeal changed the district court sentence, which the prosecution was abandoned. The court of appeal ruled in the case of a missed show, that the lieutenant had violated or failed to fulfill the duty of their obligations or the service or the military order of the provisions.
the court of Appeal condemned the shooting of the leader of the first lieutenant to three months conditional imprisonment. Become operation guardian served as chief sentenced to 80 day-fines or to pay a fine of eur 3 120 eur.
the District court had condemned the shooting of the director 60 days conditional imprisonment and became operations supervisor for 60 days the fine or to pay a fine to a total of 2 340 million.
the court of Appeal was no longer a question of indemnification obligation.
