“The anger against the kitty: ”Was an assassination attempt””
“Ex-judge: ”van Dijk would have had a solkart red card””
“Liverpool went ahead in the Champions League at Napoli’s expense.”
“Now rages the italians against a missed expulsion for Virgil van Dijk in the first half.”
“”There was an assassination attempt,” writes the Corriere dello Sport.”
“Liverpool did what was required – won 1-0 – and is thus ahead of the Champions League along with Paris Saint-Germain from group C.”
“Big hero was Alisson Becker who did a jätteräddning overtime.”
“– It is the seasonal rescue. I don’t know how he made it to the rescue. If we knew that he would be this good we would have paid double, haha. He is an incredible player. No one expected a rescue at the situation, in normal cases, there should be goals there, ” said manager Jürgen Klopp afterwards.”
“But from the Italian press and hold the directed anger towards a situation in the first half.”
“After a good fifteen minutes was Virgil van Dijk cautioned by head referee Damir Skomina after having met Napoli-striker Dries Mertens with a tackle. “
“But is now raging world-Italy v van Dijk was sent off for the offence. “
“”There was an assassination attempt from van Dijk on the Mertens. The Liverpool defender went in hard Napoli-striker, but only received a yellow card from referee Skomina,” writes the writes the Corriere dello Sport.”
“The fact that you hit the ball first does not make you exempt from the tougher penalties, which both Pierluigi Collina (former referee and now the Italian and the Uefa domarchef) and the rules clearly says”, develops the magazine’s journalist Ivan Zazzaroni.”
“Ex-judge: ”Clear red card””
“the Italians believe that the Champions League should have the economic muscles to be able to the face WAS (videodomare) already now.”
“– It should have been a red card. There has been so much talk about WHERE and when it should begin to be used in the Champions League. Now it is already too late for us, ” says Napoli coach Carlo Ancelotti.”
“And their anger is also shared by former toppdomaren Svein-Erik Edvartsen that mean that van Dijk should have been sent off already after 13 minutes.”
“”Virgil van Dijk would have been a clear red card! High speed and intensity, an unnecessary amount of force and no ability to play the ball afterwards, with the extended sole, and expose the opponent for the danger. Just such situations as Uefa clearly says should be a red card. There is exactly one such example. And it doesn’t matter if the ball is here. It has no meaning at all. This is a clear black or white situation and there is a clear red. There are no other options,” writes Edvartsen on Twitter.”
