Mothers tell why they want to invest in children’s wear.Evening magazine survey responded to the mother’s appreciate quality and are willing to pay for it. Most of the Photo
the evening paper of the questionnaire responded to the family the mother told me that are willing to pay large sums of money on children’s clothes, if the money in exchange for ethically produced and eco-quality of the garment. Many respondent pointed out that the good condition of the standing of the garment may also sell forward at a good price.
I Bought the three younger then a little better clothes, for a maximum of one child has at one time been brand clothing 1000 € value. The most expensive single item (when outer garments do not count) has paid 70 €. Clothes move to bigger smaller and when they take care of, is the resale value still good. the Vendela
All those of us used clothes are brand products. The two boys and the most expensive single investment article of clothing 200 €/piece category. the a Man or a bag of money
I’m putting in high-quality clothing, especially outdoor clothing should be durable. Sometimes going to go to the account to zero, but eg. the invoice I’ve ever bought. Not necessarily the most expensive, but useless, I had a party dress, which was considered once, more than 200 €. the Emma
I Have bought only for my kids a lot of clothes and shoes. I sold them sometimes Torissa and any buyer bachelor of the doubt, that how can they really be for one child as a new purchased. Hobby for each of them. Is their many thousands of euros to go to the current size of 134 by. the Eve
to find about respondents including a grandma, who dresses the child money to spare already in the second generation.
Yes, I’ve always invested in children’s clothing. First own three daughter’s clothes from babies until now, and now two of my grandchildren’s clothes.
the Last time I bought a jump suit, size 60 cm, price 129 €. Adults my children were upset about the expensive purchase, but I think it was reasonable, because it was the first girl grandchild! The first boy-child children excited in time, as much! My own children’s clothing the price was marks time and I remember that I paid hundreds of marks of overalls and a jacket.
I think it is always important to dress children in appropriate, but still beautifully intertwined harmonizes with the colors. I wonder those who buy their children all the time too big and dress in a terrible color combination! the Merenneito56
”Sustainable and timeless”
Many of the survey responded to the mother a justification to receive money in return, as well as the time usage that the ethical examination of sustainable clothes. Quality clothes will last, according to respondents, also more users play in a clean and intact, so part of the purchase price gets back to the flea market sale.
my Children’s closet to find the most Gugguun clothes, the next Frenzy. Resistant clothing, timeless and beautiful. Money their going, but the resale value so far still quite ok. Many cheap clothing tested, nor can they last as well as the quality of the preparation. At the same time I prefer the Finnish entrepreneurship. the Pölö
I’m putting in a sustainable, high-quality and ecological children’s clothing. Although these usually cost more (as new purchases), they sell for relatively good prices moving forward, because the use despite their age they remain in good condition. This is also a way to support domestic and save your own carbon footprint. The more expensive clothes also buy to consider, unlike cheaper chain clothing, which may take root and just one child’s use. the Nora
I Bet on children’s clothes. I don’t the price, but it’s domesticity, quality and ethics. ‘ve ever been so smitten, that I’ve been waiting behind the door many hours a published collection. the string designer
I Bet on children’s clothing, I’ve blown way too much on them, of course I bought most parts used. For me important is ecology, in the middle of the production, appearance and color. I want, that the child can use the colorful clothes, with funny pictures and that the child itself also keep. the nimimerkki1
”Stupidity payment”
One defendant, however, confessed that he had turned around. She wished she had used his money other than the child’s clothing.
the Firstborn taaperoiän until I could fan to something like “the quality, character, practicality, your looks and colors”. Then I realized, that no yard sale no longer get them anywhere near my own. It’s cheaper bought was as good, practical, easy to care for and liked, as a little time to get used before was small. The money that I had blown “quality, which takes” I could have used later for the needs of the child. What did I think of the baby-column of the conversations, I had the little used sense. Stupidity my liver.
But yeah, after all the “quality” of a good thing. Brand products part is also of high quality (I would argue: not all). But the character and appearance was of myself, at least in practice too expensive to pay, when the kids don’t even notice them and get used maybe 5 times, when already was small. the Blue
Many of the the defendant told bet its the Finnish weather conditions, only high-quality outdoor clothing.
I Bet on children’s clothing to the extent that they are in good condition and practical, preferably also good-looking. But new is not always but käytettynäkin acquired. The most expensive clothes winter jumpsuit, which is probably the more expensive investments in middle-income families otherwise. the Mom x3
I’m putting in a durable and practical outdoor clothing and shoes. The inner clothing does not matter much what kind of college, etc. 4-year-old is on top. I don’t really see as a sensible “investment” quickly consumable and small tasks for children’s clothes. the Well peekaboo