It was the second Time that the Couple stand out because of the C&A robbery in front of the Supreme court. In November 2017, this had spoken to the two of them – their debt is not prove a legally valid, reasoned the chief justice at the time. Thus they stood in opposition to the first instance: The district court of Zurich had pronounced the end of 2016, guilty verdicts and custodial sentences.
The Prosecutor called the Federal court – with success. This rejected the ruling as not traceable. The contribution to the infringement of the pair was perfectly created. The game room of the Supreme court was limited to the process by Wednesday. There is no other way to speak than the accused of aiding and abetting robbery guilty, said the court President.
Open door thanks to Insider-info
The method revolves around a robbery at the fashion house C&A in Zurich’s city center. Two brothers raided the store in October 2015. The loot amounted to about 140’000 Swiss francs. The two are now convicted and sitting in prison.
In the Robbery, they used a targeted insider knowledge about the Code to the staff entrance and the location of the vault. These “indispensable information”, the Supreme court, were supplied by the woman, who worked in C&A. She and her then boyfriend and current husband were close friends with the brothers.
the 34-Year-old had made “a very important contribution to the infringement”, the move in the vicinity of a complicity, said the President of the court. The trust your employer had “flagrantly abused”.
her husband, according to the Supreme court made the link between the woman and the two main offenders, “an active contribution to the infringement”. This, the court is not questioned, even if the exact sequence of the fact, and also the exact role of the man to be determined, because he and the woman would have to weigh these questions is always to also this Wednesday Wednesday.
pregnant Accused
The pregnant woman accused, the court gave a “good to very good” prognosis. Even if your fault is not easy, and could be, therefore, a part of conditional prison granted.
Of the 30 months, it must serve only eight. Five months on remand will be deducted. According to the court, the President of the often granted remission of one third of the penalty in case of partial conditional execution is not allowed.
man with a relevant criminal history
Otherwise, the Situation of the man from saw. The 40-Year-old is relevantly previously convicted. His prognosis was not favorable, said the President of the court. The part of the conditional execution of the 30 months is therefore not possible. The man will be time served – nearly two years -. In addition, he will have to pay a earlier due to the pronounced penalty.
This Supreme court judgment can be re-to the Federal court. The verdict is expected in the case of the woman, as he had expected it to be, said the Prosecutor after the verdict opening.
The sentence was the same as that of the first instance. The penalty for the man was mild failed, the district court had imposed four years imprisonment. Here it was, the grounds just to watch.
The defenders of the woman, commented on the judgment with only one word: “Disappointing”. He had argued for a conditional sentence of imprisonment of 12 months. The defender of the man, the criminal, mass – found, not surprisingly, is too high. But above all, “it would have been desirable,” the Federal court would not have rejected the verdict, she said on request. (lop/sda)
Created: 06.02.2019, 13:51 PM
