a jury at the Court of Elsinore has just known a 42-year-old man guilty of two rapes committed by ten-year intervals against women of 17 and 33 years old.
Thus, the court rejected the entirely to the 42-year-olds explanation that he randomly met the women who agreed to have sex with the stranger in the shrubbery in Søsum, and Hornbæk Plantage.
He even claimed that the 33-year-old victim, who was out running in the orchard came to him and said that she had ‘a fantasy’, and asked if he wanted to go in the woods.
The 42-year-old has remained silent during the police investigation and came with the explanation in the court. Senior prosecutor Bente Schnack called his explanation, ‘designed’, because otherwise he had not an earthly chance to explain that his dna with a security of one to a million is found on both victims.
Judge Mette Frimodt Hansen said after the guilty decision, all three judges and six nævninger was agreed that the 42-year-old is guilty of both rapes.
– We have given full critical attention to the forurettedes explanations, there has been a credible, detailed, and coherent, so you are found guilty after the indictment, said the president.
the Court also emphasized that the 33-year-old victim from Hornbæk Plantation had clear signs of violence.
The 42-year-old showed no signs of emotions, as he is standing with both hands lightly resting on the counter was guilty-the warrant. He is wearing a white sweatshirt with wide light gray stripes and has got a ‘armycut’ hairstyle in the prison.
in Addition to the rapes was the 42-year-old pleaded guilty in the robbery of the 17-year-old girl in Søsum, because he took her credit card, social security card and £ 100.
the Court holds a short break before the prosecution and defense beginning on their procedures, about what punishment the 42-year-old to be sentenced. The judgment to fall later in the day.
But prior to having the court decide a conflict between defender Peter Japan and the senior prosecutor Bente Schnack whether the two old judgments, which the 42-year-old has in his past, had to be documented in court.
the Judgments are over 10 years old, and can’t get gentagelsesvirkning, but the prosecutor still want to document sentences, while defender Peter Japan protests. He believes it will give the ‘fake tickets’ in the balance, when the punishment is to be measured.
– the Sentences are well over 10 years old, and it will be sniping my client, if they need to be brought forward in court, says Peter Japan.
the Defender were unsuccessful. The court gave the prosecutor permission to document the sentences.
It turns out that the 42-year-old in 1996, a 60-day suspended prison sentence for a sexual assault on a six-year-old girl on a toilet. The judgment of the court of Frederikssund was upheld by The high Court.
In 1999, he received the 40 day booklet for the violence to be followed after a woman and have toppled her over into a hedge. He held her mouth to stop her scream, but there was no more, because a witness shouted the offender, so the woman got free. The court in Frederikssund considered that there was talk about the ‘ordinary’ violence.
The 42-year defender Peter Japan said in court that his client did not want to comment on his personal circumstances: – there is no reason to, says the lawyer.
Her rapist has not been mentalundersøgt before the trial.
Senior prosecutor Bente Schnack says in his procedure, the 42-year-old should be sentenced to six years in prison.
the Rape against the 17-year-olds in Søsum in 2008, that happened before the most recent tightening of voldtægts-paragraph, should according to the prosecutor cost two and a half years in prison because he committed a robbery against the victim, while rape in the Hornbæk Plantation to the 33-year-old woman is going to cost three and a half years in prison – which today is the starting point for a overfaldsvoldtægt.
Defender Peter Ølhom points on the attack in Søsum did not include sexual intercourse, but a ‘blowjob’, (it is called today in the penal code rape other sexual relationship, red). The defender says that you can not just put the penalties for the two conditions together, but that there are ‘discount’ when there is talk about more crimes.
My client has a good personal relationship and a gf and no relevant forstraffe within the last 10 years, which has gentagelsesvirkning.
– My strafpåstand is a maximum of four years in prison, said Peter Japan.
The 42-year-old had the last word, but didn’t want to say anything.
the Judgment shall be delivered at 12 o’clock, informed the presiding judge.
the Crime Here is the police new supervåben: Must be used in Emilie-the killing