38 questions judge Anna Schneeberger at Umit-root. But the 51-year-old former chief financial officer of the real estate Empire of Bruno Stefanini it gets only a shake of the head or a gemurmeltes “No statement”.

The thing nothing to contribute has been made by Markus Brunner. The 48-year-old former managing Director of the majority of real estate manage Terresta AG of the criminal investigation and through the media publications are not only unfairly treated, but in almost impair reputation, gender as a “villain” out to be.

The lack of response prevented a judge Schneeberger, not because the Ex-Manager and Ex-Trustees of the Bruno Stefanini Foundation for art, culture and history (SKKG) of guilt and punishment acquit.

Who has the Say?

In long-standing struggle for supremacy in the Foundation of the allegation of forgery was the first criminal legal dispute between the former employees Stefaninis and his children, Bettina and Vital. Although it is ultimately a personal matter, it should have a number of agencies and courts over a number of years with the thing to deal with, said judge Schneeberger.

the starting point for the criminal-legal dispute a civil was legal. Who is allowed to determine the composition of the Board of Trustees of the SKKG? In the founding document of the year 1980 was set: no more Should be Bruno Stefanini once in a position, should the power to his children to move on.

As the children had not wanted, was looking for Stefanini as of the end of 2011, apparently after a different successor solution. At least, this impression came about because of his diary entries. In January 2014, there was a Board of Trustees meeting, at which it was decided that the deed of Foundation to modify so that Stefaninis children could have no influence on the composition of the Board of Trustees.

“For these giant balloon”

The meeting appeared to have two flaws. Those Trustee who had voted against, was not present. And sound recordings of the meetings suggested that Stefanini was not in full possession of his mental powers. He said for example: “Today is for me personally so far right … that should never … never … can give … a Foundation … for this giant balloon … Stefanini real estate, we say now, for once, is generally easy … and it happens … on … random ideas, where you had … of the children, which have been since … I said, well this is … this is not, in principle, to the base?”

After the meeting, Markus Brunner wrote for the Swiss Federal Foundation supervision of a Protocol. The accompanying letter signed also Umit-root. This Protocol, as the accusation had been drawn up “deliberately wrong”. It does not give back “in many Parts of the actual course of the meeting of the Board of Trustees”. In particular, the Protocol suggest that Bruno Stefanini’ve at any time known what it was gone. The then 88-Year-old did not understand, “what was the subject of the meeting or decision”.

Present voted to

The judge Schneeberger was different. A forgery commit, who recorded, among other things, a “legally significant fact wrong”. Legally significantly, only two points were in dispute Protocol: has Been logged, the composition of the Board of Trustees at the time of the meeting, right? And: Was rendered the decision, correct?

the composition of The Council was “not demonstrably wrong”. The sound recording is clear clear that all those present have agreed to the articles of Association amendment. Bruno Stefanini would not have been able to do that, it could also be after repeated Listening to the tape no doubt. “Whether he was actually capable of judgement, is not the question. He agreed, and nothing is logged differently.”

the quarrels around the life work of Bruno Stefanini end? The state’s attorney wants to analyze the written statement of the grounds of acquittal prior to a possible Appeal first.

Created: 28.10.2019, 23:16 PM