Five-year old man claimed to have been his panic attack in the throes of not only the driving, also the first police questioning.Murder and attempts on the accused man told the nausea of their court of appeal.One died and five others was hit by a car, when panic attack sunk the man started the wall of death in Helsinki 28.7.2017.The accused, it was a cry for help.Police replicate the hit and used by the route in connection with the investigation.
Murder and five counts of attempted murder accused lönnrot’s street hit and explained to the court of appeal in the psychological condition of the background, when the proceedings began on Wednesday.
Prosecutors claim the 53-year-old man of convictions for murder and five for attempted murder. The case went to the court of appeal, when the district court considered acts only as an aggravated manslaughter and aggravated the injury negligence. A man has been found mentally unfit to stand trial and is at Niuvanniemi psychiatric hospital care.
the court of Appeal heard a man in the morning. He told me fairly consistently and chronologically etenevästi in the act and the reasons for it.
the Man says he went to the senate square situated in the restaurant, because he wanted to taste bear meat. The man didn’t like the taste of meat, and at the same time, a panic attack feels imminent. The accused left the restaurant, driving down alexander street to their own estimate, up to 100 miles an hour and end up to kill fifty women lönnrot street. The other five remained under the car.
It was a cry that was fully ripe for panic disorder, the man claimed.
the Man told me that it had applied the cost of outpatient treatment on several occasions for help, but she had been belittled one. Man according to his “scale up” when he no longer dared to speak of his illness.
“Panic melkoisi mmillaan”
Hit and tell after the collision she had noticed a hysterical screaming woman to the hood of the car. The man did not stop or get out of the car.
[the Victim] knocked to the front of the car, which I don’t see him. Panic disorder was what melkoisi mmillaan, was not an option, that I would dare remove from the car.
the Man was driving let into the street and left the car in the end of the bar. Confusion due to him not sold alcohol. He told the police “parannelleensa” panic disorder for a moment on the couch, until “some idiot turned him in”.
the Man behaved in the court of appeal somewhat nervously, but on the other hand, he had a detailed recollection of what had happened. The man told me that they suffered as well as panic disorder that manic psychosis, and senate square they hit, according to him, at the same time – for the first time.
The first police interrogation the man claimed that he had acted, inter alia, that Finland, Sweden and russia between the wars. He also told me that he had understood, that drove in the end of a dead woman over.
– This is completely absurd the idea of running, the man defended himself in the court of appeal of war can night.
during Questioning the man also spoke to his victims, degrading tone, when told pelästyneensä deeds traces after entering the car. She inter alia claimed suivaantu that he took the crosswalk to the users and considered unimportant, was someone hurt? then hit the consequences.
the court of Appeal of the man’s views were different.
I don’t really remember exactly. I have been very confused when that questioning has been.
Vibration throughout the questioning. Was the condition of panic disorder scene there, man argument.
the Case continued to image after.
Cases treated in the district court a year ago in October. Kati PehkonenYli 100 scene
the Accused, according to a panic attack prevails in a chaotic thoughts that do not make sense. He told me that they suffered the equivalent of more than a hundred times and claimed that the purpose was not to kill anyone or cause damage.
the Man described the vehicle and the collision of mathematics and physics terms. He used the exact number of degrees the translation of its lönnrot in the street and talked to the mechanics of the basic law, when the assessed törmäystään crosswalk.
I Stopped the car, when he flew to mass slow in forward, roughly a car’s speed, the man explained.
the district prosecutor Eija Velitski appeal concerns whether the court considered “non compos mentis” watching a person’s crimes only negligence. Judgment tightening could also affect a man orders for damage compensation, even though he was not penalty guarantees of the crimes punishment.
