At 15.03 was An witness to the fact that three of the Jensen-jury members, including the mayor, left the rettslokalet in the Borgarting court of appeal.
It happened exactly two hours after that lagdommer Kristel Heyerdahl raised the Borgarting court of appeal and sent the jury out to the lack of counsel.
It means that a ruling from the second last jury in each case did not come today.
Show more
the Jury has to the common had a separate room adjacent to the saddle 250 in the Oslo district court, but was after rettsbelæringen in the day moved to the Borgarting court of appeal, that is equipped with several juryrom.
Not easy
the Jurors don’t get to talk with some others about the Jensen case, which was especially emphasized now as they sit in the lack of counsel. Rettsbetjenter make sure they have everything they need, but the jury’ll still be allowed to return home to in the evening.
They shall meet again in the morning at 09.00 in the Borgarting court of appeal. When will rådslagningen continue. The jury of four questions they need to answer “yes” or “no”.
IN the BORGARTING: While jurors in over 77 rettsdager have been sitting in the Oslo district court, they are under rådslagningen lodged in the Borgarting court of appeal. Photo: Lars Eivind Bones / Dagbladet Show more
What happens now?
– It very much depends on the mayor, and if he is a sensible man who is able to arrange the discussion so everyone gets a talk time several times, ” says former lagdommer and author of the book “the Jury for the case – democracy and security”, Lars-Jonas Nygard, to Dagbladet.
In his work he has interviewed over a hundred jurors in the Norwegian ankesaker.
– It to organize this debate is crucial. It is not easy. Lagrettemedlemmene has, however, been well coordinated in over 70 days in court. Addition, we must remember that they have discussed this issue since the first day, ” he says.
– Poor, poor people retired: the Jury in the Jensen case has now retired, after atdommer Kristel Heyerdahl has given its rettsbelæring. So considering Eric Jensen’s lawyer the.. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet / View more
the Jury will receive the said journey home in the evening and spend the night there. It means familial contact for most.
It has happened that one has been very cautious. In the Orderud case, they were accommodated in Kongsvinger. The basic rule is that they should be kept for themselves, but I do not know how the assessment has been in this case. They will probably refuse to talk about the case at home, and you have to hope they don’t spend too much time reading the newspapers, that, I think, pour not they do. They have been given many admonitions not to do it, ” he says.
left: Eirik Jensen went home just after rettsbelæringen in the day. Where shall he wait for the ruling to be read to you in the Borgarting court of appeal. He will be notified about two hours before it will be read. Photo: Lars Eivind Bones / Dagbladet Show more
He think the matter is settled first in the day Friday.
Some of the special in this case, is the vast amounts of material to the jury into the rådslagningen. Among other things, there is talk of over a thousand pages with timelines that includes everything from telecommunications, bompasseringer, the use of credit cards, cash deposits, travel, meetings, and cappelen in his other contact with hasjligaen between 2009 and 2014.
Poor, poor people. It is a tremendous material. You realize almost no that they can review everything. At the same time, there are not asked so many questions they have received from the judge. Manages the mayor to arrange the debate from there, it should not take as long. Then it is not so terrible, ” he says.
PROCESS: Even if Jensen is today known innocent by the jury, it can be a long process before he is completely exonerated. Video: Nicolai Delebekk Show more – it Becomes irritated
He points out that there often are very different types of people sitting in a jury, and that some are more dominant than others.
– They also have a private life, and it can cause small annoyances. It is not always the diving conditions are the best. There are many things that can happen. In the cases I have examined, there was often things. People were annoyed and wondered if it could be a joke to talk more about some topic. Many are impatient, ” he says.
– How much has the procedures and the actual rettsbelæringen to say? Have many already made up an opinion?
Bevisvurderingen have passed consecutively, and it is not all there which is just as essential. They probably have a perception from before, and it should a little to transform it, ” he says.
This is the questions – Jensen or Cappelen speaking false
It required more than six “yes”votes on each of the four questions that the former policeman should be found guilty.
These are the questions they need to answer:
1: the defendant Is Eirik Jensen guilty of having contributed to the illegal importation of drugs?
2: Applies to the in question 1 above-mentioned violation of a very significant quantity? This is a supplementary questions that only be answered if question 1 is answered in the affirmative: l
3: the defendant Is Eirik Jensen guilty of having received an improper benefit in the opportunity of position?
4: Is the corruption to be regarded as rough? This is a supplementary questions that only be answered if question 3 is answered in the affirmative.
midst of the Fire: – The only thing we can do now is to wait
