It was a ‘mistake’, as the Adventures by – and miljødirektør, Ulrik Winge, signed an agreement with Frederiksberg Boligfond, on paper, depriving the tenants in The Victorian City, Peter Bangs House and Svalegården their right of first refusal.
a housing fund sold subsequent properties to Blackstone for just under a billion kroner.
in Addition, it was a ‘mistake’, that the management did not inform the local council about that one, denying tenants their right of first refusal, as a deed from 1932 might provide the bearings.
Therefore criticizes the politicians of the finance committee, the so-called magistrate, the management for not giving them the necessary information in a case with so much political and economic importance for the municipality.
It displays a access to documents, which Ekstra Bladet has been in the closed point on the magistratsmødet.
Mayor Jørgen Glenthøj (K) has not wanted to run up to the interview about the consequences, but provide the following in an email:
’these articles cover ancient rome has stated criticism of the management, because the question of the bearing of any right of first refusal is not clearly described in the original case. However, it is important to emphasise that this criticism is about the clarity in the particulars of claim and not on the merits of the legal substance, that is, the Frederiksberg Municipality neither would or could renounce a possible right of first refusal on the tenants ‘ behalf, which Frederiksberg Boligfond subsequently confirmed.’
As S-deputy mayor Michael Vindfeldt was aware that he is in the light of the inadequate information had renounced the tenants their right of first refusal, he asked for an extraordinary magistratsmøde, where there was explicit criticism, he says.
– I’m not happy with the way the case is run, and it encapsulates the magistratens criticism. I will not go into personsager, since it is the mayor who is the top responsible, ” says Michael Vindfeldt.
In the lap, is it not just that tenants have a right of first refusal for the municipality, but also that they can buy it at a regulated værdimæssig price.
the Municipal council approved in november last year, that the municipality rejected its right of first refusal to get a anvisningsret to every four of the properties smaller apartments.
The decision is the Buttocks Dark Andersen from SF continue to disagree with that. He believes that the municipality should have investigated the possibility to exercise its right of first refusal to the properties.
– I still need answers on whether the municipality could have exercised its right of first refusal. In addition, I have my doubts about the value of the anvisningsaftale, as the municipality negotiated with Blackstone, he says to Ekstra Bladet.
But the agreement is signed and creates the basis that the tenants can raise a claim for damages against the municipality, if it is in the upcoming trial, with a housing fund shows that they have a right of first refusal.
the Municipality can be held responsible, because they have accepted to waive tenants ‘ right of first refusal, said lawyer Henrik Qvist, who has assisted the tenants in Svalegården.
namely, It can be crucial for the future retssagers outcome, that the municipality had signed the agreement with Frederiksberg Boligfond on the tenants ‘ waiver of the right of first refusal.
‘This requirement may be large, as the bearings in the Svalegården has been offered to purchase the property for a cash consideration of dkk. 288.760.000, while the purchase price in accordance with the secured right of first refusal is approx. 1.500.000 kr.’, writes Henrik Qvist in an email to the municipality, as the Extra Leaf has seen.
Tenants in The south Jutland Town and Svalegården are both in the process of preparing a writ of Frederiksberg Boligfond. They believe that a housing fund has deprived them of their right of first refusal.
– We will claim the right, as any in the dawn of time thought we should have. Whether it is for the local authority or a housing fund is indifferent, says beboerformanden in The south Jutland Town, Søren Berg.
the Matter may end up in the supreme court, and therefore will be able to go up to five years before Blackstone can take over the properties.
Frederiksberg Municipality were given after the incorrect agreement use for unbiased legal help.
Why hired the law firm Horten in order to provide a ‘second opinion’.
The legal opinion concluded that, ’the tenants had a right of first refusal to the properties’, and ‘Frederiksberg Municipality thus does not have renounced the option to buy on their behalf’.
the Municipality is kept confidential by the independent legal assessments and would, until now, also did not disclose who was behind the. They will be used for a possible trial, informs the municipality.
the Extra Leaf has complained to the Ankestyrelsen over the decision to keep secret the legal assessments.
