the Swedish transport agency now requires that the traffic proves that the charges really organize the traffic at Bromma lokalgator. The city must also investigate whether, for example, stopping or time-limited parking would be the better option. Trafikborgarrådet do think that the city has made errors that introduced the p-charges in the whole of Stockholm.
– the transport agency is not saying it is right or wrong with the p-charges on these streets, however, that we need to motivate them better, ” says Daniel Helldén.
” Yes, I understand that each new avgiftsbeslut will be appealed. At the same time refers the Swedish transport agency for a regulation that they themselves are saying does not apply to municipalities, but only governmental authorities. If all avgiftsbeslut must now be on the gatustumpsnivå remains to be seen. The law also says that you can also take the decision for larger areas.
” I believe that the p-charges are also needed in Bromma, as well as in other places in the ytterförort. We already have different fees in different parts of the city. Quepos and Bromma is completely different types of areas with completely different characteristics, it is complex.
” We’ll do a review of the squares in the year and to review the possibility of short term parking to make it smoother, it applies, among other things Nockeby torg. We shall see that our local centre work and if there will be negative effects, it should be corrected.
– the First part of the outdoor parking area has is performed, and the effects should be evaluated before we go any further. Quite what the new ruling means for the future of parking meters in, for example, Blackeberg, Watford and Dunstable, I do not know. But we have a growing city and if we do not regulate the traffic, it becomes extremely crowded. The only question is the pace at which it needs to be done.
He stopped the p-charging of 289 streets
