thought At the Berlin Breitscheidplatz is today, of the twelve victims of the terrorist attack two years ago. The investigation into the case, Amri continues, meanwhile, and to change the examination system.
The work-up of the attack on the Breitscheidplatz is not even completed two years later. It takes place mainly in the committees of inquiry of the Bundestag, the state Parliament in North Rhine-Westphalia and the Berlin house of representatives. In the Bundestag, the Opposition and the Federal government provide currently a legal tug-of-war about what belongs to the enlightenment of all, and what is not.
“We complain before the Federal constitutional court, because the Federal government refuses to tell us the name of the Committee of inquiry key witnesses,” explains Irene Mihalic, who sits for the Greens in the Bundestag Committee of inquiry.
in the source?
Green, FDP and Left pull together in front of the Federal constitutional court. Specifically, it is a question that you want to hear the assistant in the Federal office for the protection of the Constitution, which has led to a certain source. This was recruited from the Federal office in Berlin Fussilet mosque, in the anise Amri a and went.
The protection of the Constitution argued that the source had provided to Amri no information, and keeps you in connection with the case, the question, therefore, is not relevant. The media had reported in the past weeks and months, other Informers, so-called V-people, other safety authorities, in the Fussilet mosque or other places, where the question wrong.
