– Dear Denmark, now you shall hear how the system is abusive to my son.
Thursday. 28.2 he was – which is 2 years old) downloaded 6 time of the court in his nursery and handed over to his father.
– the Nursery should otherwise be his quiet stable base, but it is far from. And neither the nursery or the municipality to take action against these abuses – despite the fact that I tell that our son is crushed after intercourse.
the Judge has also taken his father’s party, when the case started a year and a half ago, and ago is all gone father the way – and against the law.
so begins XXXXX (the nation! of course, know about the name) a letter about the way the system treats small children – and the way the system treats her. The mother believes that six tvangsafhentninger is six too many – and then breaks she’s not about to samværsmyndigheden have spoken with her and the child’s doctor. The court has read the letter and comment on it below. The mother’s letter thus continues:
– Usually, consider the various courts in the country, that it is too traumatizing to download a small child by coercion, but it is our local right is not!
– The six tvangsafhentninger happened even though there were medical certificates, and the father was offered erstatningssamvær!
– 9. February we had reported the winter holidays, according to the law and which bopælsforælder is entitled to! But the thought of the judge not and went in and did erstatningssamvær as so should be Thursday. 28.!
– The last 4 times they have him without partshøre. They pick him up just! Without thinking about how traumatizing it is for a small child!
– Finally they picked him up was the 7. February, that he had been ill and there was a medical certificate!
– I take to my own doctor, shattered by the crying, but he tells that he dare not touch this matter more, when he has been called up by the bailiff’s court, which has given him a røffel and said that he should not rely on me, for I was full of lies!
– Now, I must then switch doctor.
– all of It is to result in a broken child of 2 years, that has resulted in the worst possible conditions in life where no one helps, write the mother, and in the answer the Court in Glostrup has sent to the nation! today, it appears that you prefer to avoid tvangsafhentninger and conversations with visiting parents and the doctors:
– The ‘ can not comment on the specific case, but provide the following information:
– the Administration may determine that a father or mother has the right to contacts. If the member then does not receive the child for visitation, this can ask the judge for help. The judge trying with the conversations, mediation, or penalty, to have the fellowship carried out.
– It happens only very rarely that the judge picks a child to ensure that the fellowship is being conducted, and as are all the other options are usually attempted.
– the Judge must always put the decisive weight on the interests of the child. Parents often have different perceptions of what is best for the child. – Therefore court assistance of child welfare, it will say child psychologists, which, together with the bailiff and the municipality is to ensure the child’s best.
– If a doctor has made a statement about the child to use the court, can the judge possibly. contact your doctor and ask for an elaboration or clarification, writes the Court in Glostrup, but what do you think?
