The Federal Council is to lead with the EU, the additional negotiations on the framework agreement, or other appropriate measures are taken to improve this. In addition, it should treat the SVP-limit initiative quickly. The calls upon the economic Commission of the Council of States (WAK).

you poured your opinion on the institutional framework agreement (Insta) in a Commission motion. Thus, the CTE of the opinion wants to give more liability, as Commission President Pirmin Bischof (CVP/SO) said on Tuesday before the media in Bern.

On Motion, the Council of States will deliberate, probably in the summer session. Both councils to take the initiative, this is an order to the Federal Council. The Commission of the Motion approved with 10 votes to 1. Councillor Ruedi Noser (FDP/ZH) requested the Council to reject it.

Joint statement

The Commission was disappointed that the Federal Council had taken no leadership responsibility, says Bishop. With the Motion she wanted to give him the opportunity to be in the EU, with more emphasis to make representations.

there Are no renegotiations and, therefore, no Changes to the agreement text should aspire to the Federal Council a joint Declaration on the Interpretation and clarification of the controversial points. Also an exchange of notes was not possible, said the Bishop. The agreement could be supplemented with additional attachments. Not a unilateral Declaration of the Federal Council, would satisfy the Commission, as such would have no force of law.

wage protection and Union citizens Directive

improvements or clarifications required by the CTE to those points, which have been criticized in the past few weeks. First of all, it’s called the protection of Wages. This should be ensured on the present state and further developed, calls for the CTE. The social partners were to be included in the improvements.

the Union citizens Directive should be explicitly excluded. State aid should be ensured that remain today in Switzerland is known to aid possible, and that also for the future game room.

accrual for dispute resolution

In the case of dispute resolution should be clearly defined to lead the factors of the existing and future EU legislation a consultation of the European court of justice (ECJ) by the court of arbitration. The Swiss court decisions could not be indirectly annulled by court of justice, calls for the CTE.

Finally, it must be ensured that the Swiss Voters takeover, despite the dynamic Law, continue to have the last word. Either to be in the agreement or by a national port legislation.

limitation initiative quickly treat

A further requirement of the Motion relates to the people initiative of the SVP “For a moderate immigration” (limitation initiative), which calls for the termination of the free movement of persons. The Federal Council shall prefer to have their treatment time. Thus the WAK wants to prevent that the voting public can only decide on the limitation initiative, after it has already decided on the framework agreement. The limitation of the initiative were to be adopted, would be a large part of the framework agreement lapses, said Bishop.

The Federal Council wants to submit the message to the Initiative, according to the Bishop, at the latest, in August. Subsequently, the National and the Council of States, this treat before it can be voted on. (red/sda)

Created: 09.04.2019, 19:00 Uhr