Eirik Jensen (61) bowed his head on the table and sighed loudly when the decision came.
the appellate Court chose to set the jury verdict aside. The court is not agree with the decision to absolve Jensen on the point that concerns about drug-related crime.
Jensen answered, “not really, but yes” on the questions from the lagdommer Kristel Heyerdahl if he understood this.
– This is further a heavy period, ” says Eirik Jensen to a gathered press corps after the decision was taken.
JENSEN-the CASE: Fagdommerne reject the jury disputed this claim in Eirik Jensen case. Video: Pool / Dagbladet Show more – That to spit on the jury
He was clearly marked and disappointed after the court sjokkavgjørelse.
This is, in simple English, as to spit on the jury. It is further a heavy period. To prepare for a new period… I don’t know how to go, ” says Jensen.
On questions about derte was the worst outcome:
– Yes, of course it was there.
Had this been an ordinary case, if there are any ordinary criminal cases, so they had enough nøyd themselves with the ruling. But this is blown large up. I think there is a lot at stake here, much more for the prosecution than people realize, ” says Jensen.
the Picture that divulged cappelen in his contact with Jensen Dagbladet Plus – Very surprising
Jensen’s lawyer, John Christian the Fire was not merciless. The verdict was appealed in the Oslo courthouse on Monday.
Fire thinks this was unnecessary of lagdommerne.
– It is very surprising that they could not accept the ruling, when the jury has been six days and discussed carefully. So has the court of appeal a different opinion. It is a little worthy of the range by the discontinuation of the juryordningen, ” says the Fire.
He continues:
They sat in six days, and there are no decisive or conclusive evidence. A specialist jury is just as good to hit as lawyers. The director of public prosecutions must consider, says the Fire.
the Fire, says the same thing Jensen’s forsvarerteam have done all the way: They will have the full disputed this claim. The fire, says he has experienced tilsidesettelser, but he says “it is not intended to overrule the decision of the jury”.
– It had definitely been on time with a closure in this case, ” says Jensen to the Newspaper.
Set aside the jury’s acquittal of Eirik Jensen
