It will be happening to you. Suddenly the police are at your door with the notice that your man is suspected of possession of child pornography. If they could have his phone. While the woman is quite upset, demanding that her husband immediately leaves the house, turns out later that he is completely innocent. It happened to a couple from Utrecht at the end of last year. The duo is now demanding indignantly apologies and a compensation of the Dutch police.

The two want to remain anonymous and be assisted by a lawyer Yehudi Moszkowicz. The duo was completely raided when two agents at the end of last year aanbelden and asked them the telephone of the man were allowed to view. There was a message that he, on his job, a movie with child porn on his phone and had to show it to a colleague. the

After examining the mobile phone in the home of the couple, there was no child pornography on stand. After some time came the monkey out of the sleeve. On the work of the man turned out to be a colleague working with the same name, there was a persoonsverwisseling.

As the icing on the cake came the agents the following day when the couple back. “They told me that there indeed was someone with the same name. The police asked what they could do to make it right, but then was set back with a huddled in the reeds sent. The woman then called the police because they are black and white wanted to have that her husband was innocent. But she was always with a platitude sent away”, says Moszkowicz.

Internal mail

The couple from Utrecht began to sit. Their counsel believes that compensation is appropriate and warranted . “Those agents were suddenly for the door. Normally you will get suspicious of a letter that you suspected and that you are a lawyer. Now they were suddenly in the house with the announcement that the man had child pornography on his phone would have. That woman was angry with her husband and began to him to shout that he is out of the house. The man clapped close completely. The confidence of the woman in her husband was completely gone.’ the

The story is about to get gekkere turn when the police eventually in a mail to the lawyer responds, but forget the internal mail of the correspondence. “In the mail, it was said that the matter was in the hands of the insurance, but there was also an internal mail between where it was said that the damage is the own risk of the police would exceed and that the matter in the hands had to be asked of the insurer for costs and possible reputation damage to occur. Then we got, however, a message from the insurer, it is waiting for a point of view of the police.’

the woman was angry with her husband and began to him to shout that he is out of the house had

Yehudi Moszkowicz

Error

Moszkowicz wait for now still on the settlement of the case, and now demands on behalf of the torque compensation of the police. “What else can you require? There is damage because of the confidence of the woman in the man is affected. That trust is suddenly gone. He was wrongly suspected of child pornography. The life of that man standing on his head. The man stood there and looked there to.”

The police in the Middle of the Netherlands can say that not substantively respond to the case. “In connection with the law on privacy should I not say or what plays or not. We have a liability insurance if something goes wrong, that I can say,” said spokeswoman Ellen the Lord.