“Runar Søgaard appeal the ruling: ”grave procedural error””
“the Ex-preacher was sentenced to prison for aggravated accounting fraud and tax evasion”
“Runar Søgaard was sentenced to 20 months in prison.”
“Now he requests that the trial shall be taken, or that he shall be freed.”
“at the same time, he goes again to the attack on the district court and believe that their actions should be assessed as a gross miscarriage of justice.”
“At the beginning of February was sentenced to Runar Søgaard, 51, to 1 year and 8 months in prison.”
“He failed to post millions of dollars and was convicted of three cases of serious accounting fraud and 20 cases of tax evasion, and got the ban on commercial activities in five years.”
“During the Wednesday, left profile, and his lawyer filed an appeal.”
“They ask in the first place to tingsrättsförhandlingarna shall be taken, and in the other hand that the court of appeal to free him. In the appeal, claiming the profile, among other things, that he not had such a role in the company that he shall be responsible for the financial statements.”
“Runar Søgaard and his lawyer, after the imprisonment has been very critical of the district court, which Nöjesbladet previously reported.”
” It has been a trial without a shootout, and without defense, said Runar Søgaard, the day after the imprisonment.”
“the Profile has the whole time denied the offence and claimed that his father, who sits in the company’s board of directors and also is indicted in the case, would be questioned again. According to the lawyer, had the father information to provide that could lead to Runar Søgaard not be prosecuted. The request for a new hearing was rejected.”
“the Prosecutor hit back”
“During the trial could the father not to attend. The district court nevertheless chose to hold the trial against Runar Søgaard.”
“the Lawyer asked that the negotiations would be held at a time when the father could be present. But the right didn’t go with it – which made the profile, went to the attack on the district court and called the lawsuit for improper and unacceptable.”
“the appeal is Runar Søgaard continued to be critical of the district court’s decision not to postpone the negotiations.”
“”It can not be considered acceptable to conduct the trial without access to these data and Runar Søgaard argues that this should be assessed as a gross miscarriage of justice,” to read.”
“After Nöjesbladet reported on Runar Sögaards criticism against the right, struck the prosecutor back against the profile.”
“– That the trial was so odd that it became was due to him himself, nothing else, ” said prosecutor Jonas Svanfeldt.”
“the Svea court of appeal will now hear the case.”