Theresa Mays agreed divorce with the european UNION has now been rejected for the third time. 344 voted against. 286 voted in favour.

Thus there is laid up for, that Britain should leave the EU d. 12. april without an agreement. Prime minister Theresa May now has two weeks to decide whether – and how – she should ask the EU for a longer exposure of brexit. At the same time, the british with great probability to the polls for the European parliamentary Elections in may, if it happens.

Theresa May says in his remark after the vote that the house of Commons must take the agreement to defeat ‘with great regret’.

– the Implications of the decision are serious. The legal starting point is now, that the Uk leaving the EU d. 12. april. In just 14 days. It is not enough time to agree on, adopt and ratify an agreement, says Theresa May and continues:

And yet the House has clearly said that they will not leave the EU without an agreement. Therefore, we must now agree on a way forward.

Policy – 29. mar. 2019 – at. 05:28 Total confusion about brexit: Get an overview here

May says, however, that the government will continue to try to get it ‘decent brexit’, which will respect the outcome of the referendum by 2016.

The british parliament should now, by all accounts, the vote on the alternative brexit-scenarios after the weekend. On Wednesday, parliament rejected the eight different ideas. The question now is whether there can be formed a consensus on a, for example, a softer brexit, which includes membership of the common market; or whether the parliament will go for a confirmatory referendum, which May strongly opposed.

Labour’s leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said after the vote that Theresa May must go now and requires at the same time, a new general elections.

the President of The European Council on Friday afternoon posted on Twitter that he convenes a crisis meeting of the EU’s 27 heads of state and government.

Denmark’s prime minister Lars Løkke Ramsussen about to be well and thoroughly sick of the british.

– It is for me incomprehensible that the british house of commons did not take up the possibility of an orderly brexit. In place – now for the third time – rejected udtrædelsesaftalen, he says to Ritzau.