“Wake up call”. It is the word of the hour among the supporters of the Amendment to the firearms act. The results of the first survey to the voting templates of 19. May should concern us, says FDP councillor Josef Dittli: “We need to teach the people the importance of Schengen is even more apparent.” The membership in the European Security network and in the asylum agreement in Dublin would be eliminated if a no with the greatest probability.

Over 14’000 people from all over Switzerland took part in the beginning of April online in the first wave of the Tamedia-vote survey. The weapons law of the strong opinion that education is at the two poles of the political remarkably, traps, says study author Fabio water: “it will be Interesting to watch what happens in the middle, because this vote is decided.” A total of 53 percent of the voting population support the template, 46 percent say no. While the SP and the SVP over three-quarters are clearly in favour of or against, the approval of the FDP (50 percent) and the CVP (47 percent) is lower than you might expect due to the Yes-slogans of the parties. Also, CVP national councillor Ida Glanzmann, how Dittli member of the non-partisan Yes Committee, speaks of a Wake-up call: “We have to stay until the end.”

image to enlarge

the survey shows clearly that the weapons of the law-the vote is only to win, if the voting population can be convinced of the importance of Schengen. Because even the opponents are the fears that the Tradition of the shooting sports in jeopardy, and to Protect would be too much of rods, barely. Luca Filippini, President of the community of interest to Protect Switzerland (IGS), feels empowered: “The people do not understand that this law of adaptation to a special right to Protect, but rather a political question of principle.” This toad must swallow, because it was a completely useless law, and Schengen is not endangered.

to The contrary Economiesuisse Director Monika Rühl vehemently: “no, we run the risk of automatic termination of both agreements this year.” In particular, for the economy, emphasized Rühl and refers to a study by the Federal government: Therefore, the elimination of Schengen, by 2030, would mean up to 1600 francs less per capita income and a decline in exports by up to 5.6 percent. Rühl points out that the vote battle was just underway: “a Lot of Yes-actors are in the wings.” Explain why the no-share at this time is still relatively high.

On woman power of the competent Federal councillor Karin Keller-Sutter, as you said at the meeting of the women’s network Woman-to-East on the last weekend. She was sure that the women will play in this vote an important role: “Almost four out of five are for the new law. And you’re right.” The survey confirms this trend: The majority of women unlike the men, Yes, for the weapons of law – but only with two-thirds and not with four-fifths.

Older clearly

Clearly, the results for the AHV-tax-template. According to the first wave of the Survey, 62 percent of the voting population support the new edition of the 2017 failed corporate tax reform III. The tax relief will be compensated with a supplementary financing of the AHV.

the improvement of The financial Situation of the AHV-AVS does not enjoy quite unexpectedly in the elderly population is large. The 65-Year-olds are in favour of the template with 70 percent. In addition, the electorate of all parties say Yes. The approval of the SVP, which has decided to vote share, however, is only just. The slogans of their parties, not a consequence of the supporters of the Greens and the green liberals afford. Although both parties argue for a “no”, in favour of 65 percent of Greens and 67 percent of the green liberals, the AHV-control-template.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 04.04.2019, 21:55 PM