14. February in the year was Nicholas Cruz (19) arrested after he had shot and killed 17 students at the high school Marjory Stoneman Douglas High Schoopl in Parkland in the united STATES.
Thursday came a preliminary report from Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Comission, which has been given the responsibility of investigating skoleskytingen.
They point to a number of conditions that led to that masseskytingen was as serious as it was. Some of the harshest criticism being directed at the school’s own security guard, and some of the politibetjentene who responded to the school, writes CNN.
Police said the
It is in so far not surprising that it is directed harsh criticism against the 54-year-old armed police officer who was stationed abroad at school when Cruz opened fire inside the school.
Already a short time after skoleskytingen he was criticized for having failed to go into the building to confront the perpetrator, and he also said after first having been suspended by the local sheriff, Scott Israel.
– He should have gone in and confronted the killer. Killed the killer. The policeman did nothing while the offender was in there for up to four minutes, illuminated, Israel, during a press conference in February.
Believes the police officer should have stopped the shooter: – I am crushed. There are not words Neglected his duty
Also in the fresh report gives politibetjenten rudely with. The report states that he “neglected his duty” and “not acted according to his training and fled to a position where he himself was safe”.
the Report also states that politibetjenten instructed other police officers to stay away from the building while the shooting unfolded.
“N. N was in a position to engage Cruz and reduce the extent of the damage, but he chose not to do it”, said the report.
the Cop slapped not alarm, as he should have done. Days after the massacre, it was also published video footage from the outside of the school, which showed that the politibetjenten took up positions outside instead of to enter. Politibetjentens lawyer stated that his client believed the shots came from the outside.
was NOT: Overvåkningsbilder shows that the officer chose not to go into the school when the shooting unfolded, but remained on the outside. Photo: Courtesy of the Broward County Sheriff’s Office via AP / NTB scanpix Show more – Unacceptable
not politibetjentene that turned out to be spared in the report. According to the report displays video images and witness accounts that several of them took time to recover and take on bullet-proof vests in addition to to remove and replace equipment while skoleskytingen unfolded.
the Report states that their actions were “unacceptable and in violation of the approved protocol, which says that politibetjentene immediately should have gone against the shots to confront the shooter”.
Other politibetjenter to have arrived on the north side of the building, and was there even if the shooting unfolded.
Shot and killed 17 peers: This is the perpetrator
the Report also draws out a number of other factors they believed contributed to the catastrophic outcome.
Open and unmanned door
video surveillance at the school was not good enough, it was not the speaker system in the hallways, which meant that students could not be notified and given instructions, and Cruz could get into the school through an “an open and unattended door”.
“Cruz exploited this open and unmanned front door and it is there that gave him access to the school. This open and unmanned door was a sikkerhetsbrist”, said the report, which is very critical of the school administration provide the lack of personnel as the explanation that the door was open.
“Unacceptable”, reads the report response of the school leaders ‘ explanation.
Video of interrogation
Recently also released the police a video of the first interrogation with the perpetrator. In the interrogation replies Cruz for the most part in short sentences.
Learn buried 19 students during the shooting: – It could have been worse
the Interrogation, as the prosecution has previously published a transcribed version of the, contains information about the parents ‘ deaths, his penchant for killing animals, his ekskjæreste, his brother, weapons, suicide attempts and especially the “voice”. A voice in his head to have appeared after his father died around 15 years ago, but became worse after his mother died in november of last year.
When the investigator asks Cruz what the voice says, he answers:
– Burn. Kill. Destroy, black Cruz.
Already in the first interrogation he told about the voices in your head: “Burn. Kill. Destroy”
Burn, kill, destroy, what?
– anything.
the Investigator who interrogated him did not believe on him.
I think there is no vote, said the investigator.
After this asked Cruz about the lawyer.
the Interrogation of Cruz is important for the perpetrator’s lawyers, if they want to build the defense that he is insane, or to show mitigating circumstances if he should face the death penalty.
His lawyers have previously expressed that Cruz will say guilty in exchange for a life sentence without the possibility of parole.
Parents, teachers, and the psychiatrist realized that something was wrong. But not where the wrong
