the Man was convicted of raping a female colleague in connection with a summer party for the law firm’s employees. DN has previously examined the law firm’s action: after the rape was the female lawyer on sick leave for a period of time. When her probationary period would see a shift in the fixed service, she had to leave the agency management felt that they had ”enough evidence” to determine if she would have continued employment.
was hovrättsrättegången against the man finished. The court members had held its deliberation and decision in the blame – but the judgment had not been communicated to the public. The lawyer submitted new evidence, including the article from Today’s News.
Evidence was tested during an extraordinary rättegångsdag in the court of appeal and the man was convicted. In his appeal to the HD, he argued that the decision of the members of the board had been biased, since the before the new evidence relied on had already taken a position on the question of guilt.
According to the decision, it lacks ”a reasonable basis for the assumption” that the court members not in an impartial way would be able to evaluate the importance of the new investigation. Thus stands the judgment of two years in prison for rape fast.
Read more: Raped by juristkollega after summer party – now get the woman to go
Read more: HD-the decision to impair the mode of Kulturprofilen