Hear what the Newspaper their commentators have to say about Erna’s answer in the video at the top of the case.
” I am very concerned that an increase of family benefits must not be an obstacle for integration. It will be if you reward immigrant parents who have children four-five or six, said the former minister of justice, Per-Willy Amundsen (progress party) to the TV 2 in the last week.
He advocated to limit or stop the family benefits for barnerike families – and justified it, in essence, that would prevent immigrant families get a lot of children.
the Proposal raised disgust in many, but neither Siv Jensen or Erna Solberg has commented on the statement – until today.
– Taking distance – Embarrassing for the Uk
In a Facebook post on Thursday, Jensen took distance from the statement of the Amundsen.
– There have been a lot of discussion about Per-Willy Amundsen’s statement last week. The progress party has never considered to differentiate the allowance on the basis of ethnicity. It is not applicable. This came completely wrong and is not acceptable, but I have talked with Per-Willy, and he has said that he has not meant it so, and I think that’s good, said Jensen Thursday morning.
– Society with opportunities for all
Also Erna Solberg spoke Thursday after to have received criticism of Krister Claussen Hoaas a letters to the editor in Bergens Tidende, where he writes that “the tier agree, because silence indicates acceptance.”
today black Solberg following the indictment in a post in The new york times.
His debatteknikk is therefore to mistenkeliggjøre me and the Right to have opinions we don’t have. The conservative political project is to create a society with opportunities for all. The conservative notion states that all human beings are born free and different, but with the same inviolable intrinsic value. This has been a guiding principle for me throughout a long political life.
Will probably by today. This can be Hareides new role – the Victim-card
the Answer to Solberg, however, has created great dissatisfaction in the social media. Several politicians have advocated on Twitter.
– So was the victim-card is played. For it is everyone else’s fault that the prime minister inaugurate extreme people as ministers. And all the other’s fault that she spend a week on the to turn away, writes Kim-André Åsheim in A on Twitter.
Also Åsheims partikollega Karin Andersen responds:
When in the course of many days not able to take distance from one’s former minister of justice, takes your words to income of ethnic-based benefits in the Uk, then there is every reason to suspect that a believes that it is okay yes. Your responsibility Erna, she writes on Twitter.
These reactions come at the same time as we get to know about the Right, the progress party, the Left and the christian democratic party has say yes to the framforhandlede regjeringsplattformen. After nearly six hours of discussion, it has still not come any avkaring.
the Right and the progress party will be finished with their meetings, while the KrF and the Left is still discussing whether they should join regjeringsplattformen or not.
Follow skjebnemøtene live here.
Sources of the Newspaper: – It is Better that drag things out
