In a way you can feel sorry for the Left party. During the last parliamentary term, put it in the power of absolute proximity, of self-esteem of a rödgardist could party drum through vinstbegränsningar in the welfare and tax increases. Video: listening.
And V became persona non grata in american politics. Suddenly not only would The sweden democrats but also the Left party be kept as far away from influence as possible. Jonas Sjöstedt was just up in the butter, but when he on Thursday delivered his christmas speech, he was locked out of both the refrigerator as the kitchen. It must feel like to come back from the summer holidays and notice that even the old bunch of money, without any explanation, turn your back to. A little sad it is still. What was it really happened?
Let’s start with that once and for all take the death of one of the most stupid arguments in the Swedish samtidsdebatt. As late as last Wednesday, was repeated by Aftonbladet’s political editor-in-chief Anders Lindberg:
to the children. SD does not believe that the jews are the swedes and intend to repatriate people who have already made themselves at home in our country. It is, with all due respect to any risks associated with the glasögonbidrag, not comparable to the greats.”
It is stupid for several reasons. Firstly, it is bizarre to compare an altruistic proposal from the party with the obscenities uttered by the partiföreträdare. Equally true, and stupid, would be to write: ”SD want to let our old living at home. V defends the dictatorship in Cuba.”
To require that neither the Eu or Åkesson shall be given influence over american policy is not to ”equate” them.
There are certainly several similarities between the parties. In both cases, they have in recent history demonstrated clear anti-democratic moves, their leading figures have joined as parties embraced the communist respective fascist social models.
the Left want to draw a straight left against exactly the thing that made Sweden rich and free.
A reasonable point of view is that SD today is one of the more it’s been a democratic and unreliable party than V, but that there are good reasons to keep both Åkesson as this would short. Both parties are opposed to it, in the broad sense, liberal and open model of society that has created infinitely more wealth than all the other tested systems together.
Still, the party representatives with the revolutionary fervor of defending the dictatorship cattle Castrodynastin in Cuba and Venezuela chavister.
Still speaking V with the wrath of the evil and entrepreneurs ‘ greed. Still sitting party leader in the tv and says that the right of ownership shall be eliminated, to large corporations such as Ikea and H&M to be taken from their owners and transferred to the employees.
the welfare system that the Left party is against, it’s the profits and business in general. The party wants to draw a straight left against exactly the thing that made Sweden rich and free.
When the socialists as Anders Lindberg trying to vitmåla Note the black pages, it is one of the reasons that can be summed up in four letters: Power. Rather than sit in the opposition, and rather than seriously compromising with the liberal mittenkrafter, to the social democrats continue to lean towards a systemomstörtande party.
Decemberöverenskommelsen pushed the social democrats into the Left’s arms. It is a mistake that must not be repeated.
