The game if power
L top: ”Regrets that the proposal could not be examined”
the Centre party, the solid-settlement – Liberals were in favor
the Liberal partiledning regrets that the proposal was negotiated with the S, MP, and C could not be tested harshly.
Jan Björklund and his partiledning draws completely different conclusions than what Annie Lööf do.
– The completed proposal contained a number of points which had been the key achievements of the Liberals, writes the party secretary Maria Arnholm (L) in an internal email to members.
It is in an internal email, which the newspaper Aftonbladet have taken part of, as the Liberals ‘ party secretary, gives his and the party’s view of the political situation.
She writes, where, among other things, that the negotiations between the S, MP, C and L were constructive and ”contained a number of points which had been the key achievements of the Liberals”.
Aftonbladet has previously reported that the party was ready to drop, until Stefan Löfven.
It was on Monday morning as the påtänka the settlement between the parties failed. The plan was that a S\u002FMP-the government would initiate a budgetary cooperation with the C\u002FL. But it all fell when it got pulled out on the grounds that the social democrats refused to move on several important issues.
It also got the L to give up the plans and the party will just as the C to vote against Löfven as prime minister on Friday.
Radar up political victories
In retrospect, it has become clear that the L, unlike C, had a completely different image of it that has been negotiated.
Arnholm radar in the e-mail up the sakpolitiska profits, she argues, that L did.
It was, inter alia, if ”the greatly reduced marginal tax rates through the elimination of the war, a restoration of assistansreformer by very large bets on the LSS, sharply increased defence spending, skrotande of Reepaluutredningens proposal, important measures in the area of integration (mandatory, including the språkförskola for the newly arrived) and several skolsatsningar for increased kunskapsfokus and more peace. In the area of housing policy included the free rents in new construction and other deregulation”.
the party secretary is writing at the same time, when it comes to structural economic reforms wanted to go longer, but that it went in the right direction.
”In a separate agreement between the Liberals, the social democrats and the green Party also included a stop to the creation of new religious private schools”.
”This description is not accurate”
She also stresses clearly that L is not in any way said no to the negotiated, and to set up its planned partiråd:
”This description is not correct. Worker’s party and democratic party discussed the proposal thoroughly and was intended to make a decision on Monday, but then the Centre party said no on Monday morning fell throughout the proposal there and then. Myself, I regret that the proposal could not be examined, the final of our partiråd”.
the Party’s stance in the regeringsfrågan is fixed. For a alliansregering should be able to enter, it is required that it is anchored over the blockgränsen. Ulf Kristerssons ”3-2-1”-the government is not was it was also the reason why L voted no to the M-leader as prime minister.
in Order to L to change this perception, or release Löfven, is required continued a decision on the partirådet.
It is known that the L’s opposition is fragmented into regeringsfrågan. Several members of the committee were adverse to the talks with the S and want to instead release Ulf Kristersson (M).
