Lööf policy can give SD more voters

Aftonbladet leader board is independent socialist.

The seventh of June, 1926 resigned the government, Rickard Sandler (S) after a prolonged gruvarbetarstrejk – Stripakonflikten – in Västmanland, sweden. The bourgeoisie in the bicameral because of the Striping managed to get a majority behind a policy that the social democrats felt encouraged strejkbryteri.

Göran Persson (S) often quoted Sandler during the government formation talks after the elections in 2002. You can’t go along with anything just to get to hold on to power. Although the social democrats won the elections and received almost 40 per cent, but the Greens got tangled and wanted to have ministerial posts. When they got no tried The green form a mittenregering together with the Centre party, Liberals and Christian democrats.

However, Göran Persson waited out all of them. Then he reigned ahead with a cooperation agreement, the so-called \

Also, Stefan Löfven, chose the same strategy when Annie Lööf (C) and Jan Björklund (L) presented their so-called \

– these requirements should be seen as a clear requirement for P to accept or to reject that we even have to consider whether we should tolerate Stefan Löfven in statsministeromröstningen. It is up to P to reflect the requirements that we will present to them, ” said Annie Lööf to the DN.

” I’m prepared, and the party is prepared, said Stefan Löfven. And then not say anything more.

If Annie Lööf, the seriousness of Leaves will fold flat, there will be no government. The list of requirements is substantially to the right of the government Reinfeldt, and would require that the social democrats are, in principle, change its policies towards the Centre. In addition, the required Jonas Sjöstedt (V) support in parliament as the social democrats would not be able to get through the policy even if they wanted to. So why act Loof as she does?

the Explanation is probably that she’s bluffing. The truth is that Annie Lööf don’t really have any particularly strong negotiating position, just as the green Party had it in 2002. Her choice is still between S and SD. She can of course trap Stefan Löfven in the week, but what happens then?

Annie Lööf seems honest in their hatred of SD. She surrounds herself with an aura of dedication and want to represent the modern, open and creative Sweden. In the election campaign kampanjade she with young, cool entrepreneurs that Isabella Löwengrip and scolded Jimmie Åkesson in a live broadcast. She releases now until SD to köttgrytorna will all see it as a theatre. She no longer has that choice.

In Denmark we saw in a week what happens when you invite right-wing extremists in the heat. Where has the conservative government has just concluded negotiations with the Dansk Folkeparti on next year’s budget. At the same time, launched a \

the Government and Dansk Folkeparti also announced a new policy on criminal matters.

” We have been discussing criminal aliens a lot. We implement a proposal on a deserted island, where they should be placed, ” says Peter Skaarup, the Dansk Folkepartis group leader.

The deserted island to serve as a kind of internment camp before the foreigners deported. At Dansk Folkepartis official twitter account, they have put up a small cartoon where a man in islamic dress running off to the island in a fishing boat to the sound of the måsars screams. So see the price tag for far-right support in Denmark and The sweden democrats are hardly worse negotiators. This know Annie Lööf.

It is of course possible that The list of requirements was a scam, a skambud designed to be able to release a SD-leaning government led by mr Ulf Kristersson, and then try to blame on the social democrats. But in that case, we will soon find out.\nfor more likely is that there was a minimum selling price and the start of a negotiation process. In this case, there is reason to examine the policy’s content. The centre party wants to completely remove the level of employment protection in small firms and regulate the salaries of, among others, newly arrived in the lowest level. On a large part of the labour market, people would basically be lawless at the same time as wages are squeezed down. In addition to individual would suffer the political consequences could be devastating.

Still, the S or SD

Probably has Annie Lööf gone on their own myth about that the Socialists will do anything for power. But there is a limit when an additional choice is to be preferred.

2002 was the opposition initially rock hard, the Greens asked the kabinettsfråga on ministerial posts. But because no other government was possible, it was eventually Göran Persson in all cases. The coldest ice in the stomach won. In the same way, there is really no realistic alternative to the Video: in the day, not if you want to stop the SD. And the ball is still where it remained the whole time – with Annie Lööf.