“No, you do not speak for all of ”us immigrants””
“Replica from CUF members on collectivisation”
“This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against.”
“REPLICA. In his op-ed, writes the Liberal Mikael Trolin, a local politician for the C Haninge, about how the way that the Centre party and the Liberals chose in regeringsfrågan was a ”rescue” for ”all of us with immigrant backgrounds”. “
“He writes that it mittenalternativ which now has become the show that Annie Lööf and Jan Björklund ”dared to stand up for all of us with an immigrant background”, and that ”the majority of the millions of inhabitants with a migrant background now draws a sigh of relief”.”
“It is incredibly disheartening to an author elected official chooses socialism over factual arguments. ”Us immigrants” is an anti-liberal basis. The liberal idea is to ask the individual at the centre and not kollektivisera on the basis of gender, race, or religion. “
“In both the Centre party Liberals, there is the majority of members and elected representatives with an immigrant background who were ready to drop, until Ulf Kristersson and argued respectfully and factually to their case. “
“They would not consider itself represented by Mikael Trolin, or his opinion that the mittenkonstellationen best represents their will and interests – just because they like him also have an immigrant background.”
“It is perfectly possible to argue for the solution that has now become without kollektivisera a whole group and in addition, the use of ill-chosen words ”rescue”. Rescue from what, Kristersson and Åkesson? “
“Had they used the same choice of words if, for example, women had it been an outcry. Women are not infantile actors who need to be rescued from either the right or left – but fully able to make their own policy choices, is recognised. But apparently that does not apply the same rhetoric of ”us immigrants”.”
“Immigrants are neither the bat or tool in the debate. They are individuals with as wide a åsiktsspann as the group of men, women, christians and so on. They vote on everything from The sweden democrats to the Left party. “
“Like you do not, you get to sharpen their arguments, not at least if you belong to a liberal party. To beat their chest and say that by a certain political options not only saved a whole group but also speaks for the group in question immediately is not a liberal representatives. “
“It immediately nor liberal colleagues to encourage, or to accede to such rhetoric.”
“nDana Pourkomeylian, district Centre party Youth Western GötalandnJonatan Skagerberg, vice-chairman of the Centre party youth Västra Götaland”
“the Article is a replica. Read the full the debate here – ”
