According to Toni Bortoluzzi Cribs for children are harmful. The IQ is declining, the resilience also. What do you say?
I know neither the study nor the psychiatrist, is portrayed in the brochure. You want to do so in a comprehensive and accusatory statements, then it would have to be a very prestigious, very long, comprehensive and, above all, representative study, which presents the results in a connection to the existing research findings. Otherwise it is just a questionable hypothesis. Or in the best case, a single study, an outlier. Either way it is scandalous, to make a campaign and all that has carried out the research in the last twenty years, except for Eight.
Why the attack now?
you would have to ask Mr Bortoluzzi. Based on the brochure of the Association protection initiative, which is characterized, in my opinion, clearly ideological. This booklet uses, and fuels the already existing Fears of many parents about the care of a third party. It will be understood, therefore, that you do not trigger a big response, even if they stand in terms of content, the knowledge of the research represented. And even worse, the new mom myth, she pays homage to: the summoning of the good mother stays with the children and in their service. It is not a mystery to me why the wheel of time so back is turned, especially since it is the statistics of today’s family is not at all models: Only 15 percent of the pairs to practice the model with full-time employed man and economically inactive woman. The most popular model is the full-time (male)-part-time (woman) with nearly 70 per cent. A good 60 percent of these couples leave their children in a daycare service. This sacralisation of the mother is in stark contradiction to the claims of politics and the economy.
What says the Cribs, the research on the psychological effects of children?
To the question of whether the crib is actually harmful, there are a very large number of studies, a total of two Camps. While both of the bearings in relation to the intellectual child development to the same conclusion – that a foreign supervised children develop at least as well or better than exclusively at home looked after children –, they differ in terms of social behavior. The States is a stock that crib children in school, socially competent, self-confident, cooperative and enforcement-capable, less timid behavior and overall cooperative. The other camp reported of tendency of behavior difficulties and attachment disorders. Therefore, nursery children can also be rude, impetuous, irritable and aggressive.
What do you think?
The advantages of Cribs outnumber. Even the more critical research comes to the conclusion that foreign assistance can be particularly harmful when children are not looked after very early and very intensively, except for the family if the care is not of good quality, if the chemistry is right between you and the child and especially If the family difficulties. A big advantage of nurseries is a regulatory effect in the case of children of most educated parents, often have a tendency to Overprotection is also.
So all the kids in the crib?
no, it’s not. What irritates in the Initiative, is the absolutism. I am very much in favour that there should be no right or wrong in the care of the question. Parents should choose the model that fits you, your ambitions and your professional conditions – and especially to their children. Often this is a Mix from the nursery, caring for Parents, Nanny or grandparents.
Bortoluzzi rejects Nativity scenes, per se. But there are also renowned education researchers, for small children, crib warning: Only between two and three years given the necessary commitment to safety.
in fact, there are experts, which represented the view, was a crib in the first two years of life are unfavorable. I consider this to be too prescriptive. Every child is different. The Temperament of the child plays a role, whether it is, for example, shyness, or, rather, proactively and of its environment. Clearly, if you put a one-Year, five days per week in the nursery, I would have my concerns. But most of them small children only a couple of hours in the day-care centre.
you are an advocate for the Common Sense?
more Important than the rule of “the first two years in the nursery” is that mothers and fathers listen to their Intuition. It is also not so that a small child is apparently acquiescent in the crib, has a high binding security. Attachment security also includes separation anxiety – and the ability to comfort to receive, for example, of a teacher as a secondary support person. The parents know their children best. And you should also be willing to seek a solution other than the current one, if you don’t feel that it is the child especially good. Often a daily family or a Nanny is the better solution, because it allows, especially in the first two years of life, a more dyadic relationship, i.e. a relationship between the child and the caregiver.
Just not everyone can afford a Nanny. The Nanny as a luxury variant is a cliché. Who has more than one child, a Nanny is worth it as soon as possible. And parents can – what the Trend is also to get together and share a Nanny to hire. (Editorial Tamedia)
Created: 14.12.2018, 10:57 PM
