A majority in the Parliament is ready to provide minister for foreign affairs Anders Samuelsen (LA) a nose.
Anders Samuelsen must have criticism, because he has given the researchers permission to quote highly confidential information from Foreign Tribunals in connection with a krigsudredning. It writes Berlingske.
the foreign Minister has also been accused of misleading Parliament by giving two different explanations in connection with the course.
– It smells strongly of a nose for him, but we can not make any judgments before we have heard about, what he explains, says the president of the Foreign policy Board, Søren Espersen (DF), to Ritzau.
Espersen, together with the vice-president of the Foreign affairs policy Board, Nick Hækkerup (S), called Samuelsen in consultation on Friday, at 11 o’clock, where he will get the opportunity to explain himself on the matter.
When a majority in Parliament, says the criticism of a minister, called it a nose, and it may vary in size.
Samuelsen gets supposedly a nose, because he has broken with a very important principle: that the meetings of the Foreign policy Board is always confidential.
– You get as a new member of the board trommet into their head that it is confidential. Then it may wonder that, some years after, lets quote it as you want to. It is a very big problem, ” says Søren Espersen.
He does not want to assess what it may have had of the consequences. But Søren Espersen expect that Anders Samuelsen Friday will make concessions regarding its role in the process.
Although it requires a majority in the Danish Parliament to give a nose, works Espersen confident about how the case ends.
– It ends with a nose.
– the Size comes much depends on how much he will accept that he has caused. It is very important that you clearly say that it was a mistake. It always makes the nose smaller, he says.
It is, according to Espersen hypothetical to talk about whether the foreign minister can definitely talk the nose away with major concessions.
Nick Hækkerup (S) hills, according to Berlingske up on the criticism.
It’s the same Eva Flyvholm (Unity), who is a member of the board.
– Therefore, we agree that there should be pronounced criticism of the minister. How sharp the criticism will depend on the consultation tomorrow (Friday, ed.), she says to the newspaper.
