“Science must be able to be reviewed”

“Kragh has the most ideological intentions”

“This is a kulturartikel which is a part of Aftonbladet’s opinionsjournalistik.”

“A conclusion one can draw from the past few weeks of debate, is that there is no longer free to question the security research. At least not if the researcher named Martin Kragh. He has the right worldview, therefore, his work is untouchable.”

“Science is and can be truth-seeking. But because some research, nevertheless, is ideologically driven, it is important to examine texts that have a scientific claim. “

“It is the intersubjektiva prövbarheten that makes science science. If the source material consists of a database, the database must be provided to other researchers to be able to make about the survey and come up with the same result. There is no database available, disqualified the study. “

“To the scientific craftsmanship is also a stringent structure. It slafsiga the concept of ”Putin’s narrative” does not meet this requirement. It is moderately hot in order to Kragh underneath to be able to sort out all the possible that he evident dislike; the Nato-critics, or tredjeståndpunktare become empiricism. “

“It is on the bolinerna he concludes that Aftonbladet is Putin’s ”host” in Sweden. It is actually what he claims in his report from 2017. (Seen that way, was the Swedish newspaper ”Putin’s narrative” already in the 50’s.) “

“this shows just Kragh has more polemical and ideological intentions than scientific. His avhumaniserande jargon simply do not belong in a scientific text. That the report received considerable international dissemination enhances the scientific content, but well the damage for those affected. “

“To the scientific assessment is also the context in which they conduct their research. Research on security policy has become a hybridverksamhet between universities, private institutions, government agencies and foreign think tanks with maktkapital in the back. It requires a specific ideological profile in order to qualify in such an environment? “

“It would be an urgent task to make a vetenskapssociologisk study of how such networks are created and how they work, and how they affect the research that is being conducted.”

“What we have also seen in recent weeks, is the double måttstockarnas psychology. Let’s say a Swedish docents name shows up in a leaked Russian document, that claim that they are working for a chaotic Russian authority was purpose is to smear displeasing politicians and publishers in other countries. Then it had been a fucking life. All had committed themselves.”

“A final word: Martin Kragh posing with a martyrgloria not dress him. He claims that Aftonbladet is trying to get him to stop researching. It is of course not true. But the question is what Kragh has for the purpose with their business? Our view is that he’s trying to get us to stop writing about Nato and the rehabilitation of old nazis in the Ukraine. “