DebattÅSIKTAvtalet will attract migrants to the SverigeSlutreplik from Kristina Winberg (SD) on the UN immigration agreements This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not the newspaper Aftonbladet.Photo: TTEnklaste way to ensure that migrants do not need to put themselves in fragile rafts, is that the problems that drive them away are resolved where they arise. In the home country, writes Kristina Winberg (SD), Meps in their slutreplik if migrationsavtaletDEBATT
SLUTREPLIK. Initially, migrationsavtalet GCM creates, of course, no new social rights. But existing rights will be exploited more and more. Who should pay for this?
And given that more and more european countries are jumping of, the signer thus to form an ever-stronger pull-factor.
Then it can be discussed to what extent the GCM has been the subject of myths and political propaganda, something that I myself, apparently, is involved in, which caused the EU countries such as Hungary, Austria, Poland, the Czech republic, Bulgaria, Slovakia, and countries such as Switzerland, Australia and the united states not to sign on.
You are amazed! Here She opened the door to a world, where myths and political propaganda is the basis for the decision on the states must sign the international agreement or not.
We see all the time how the dissidents in the migration issue was explained away, ridiculed, or demonized
For there may well never be, so that these EU countries also have been critical of the EU s wreck of the migration guncelgirisi.com ‘package’ – that they have a different attitude to migration?
We see all the time how the dissidents in the migration issue was explained away, ridiculed, or demonized; now, it is leftovers. Myths or not, would inevitably seem to the spoken and written word can be dangerous in these times.
So let’s talk briefly about freedom of expression. What has an article on the freedom of expression to make in a immigration agreements? Well, to look good on paper. For in one and the same article commits states to protect freedom of expression, but at the same time to support some media and train journalists. And to end public subsidies to the media, who promotes intolerance and other forms of discrimination of migrants.
Why the need for journalists education on migration? Why is it so important to be able to pull in public subsidies? Can you ana link? I don’t think the editors will let any employees miss the training in migration. It can compromise the least. And self-censorship can have while maintaining the formal freedom of expression. No problem, that is.
Since my op-ed now described by Cecilia Wikström as part of a propaganda campaign, which mytspridning, the half-truth meaning to scare people, well the media that spreads the risk their public subsidies?
A question I never, never, ever, received a reply on is the following: What, what exactly, is it for the errors and deficiencies in the current system with the application for a work permit for the foreign citizens, wishing to work in Sweden or the EU?
You basically need only a valid passport and a job offer. You must not need to risk their lives in order to maybe get to work
legally in Europe.
Finally; I have said it before. I teach the need to say it again, many times. The easiest way to ensure that migrants do not need to put themselves in fragile rafts, is that the problems that drive them away are resolved where they arise. In the home country. Somewhere else can these problems not be resolved.
When the problems are resolved (or dissolved), it is absolutely fine to apply for a visa or a work permit and come to Sweden as a tourist or a professional.
Kristina Winberg (SD), Mep
Join in the debate and comment on the article
– like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook.
the Article is a slutreplik. Read the full debate here
