“Your policy is a hypocrite, Busch Thor”
“Debater: KD say one thing and mean another.”
“This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against.”
“REPLICA. Ebba Busch Thor has done KD to senior sjukvårdsparti with public statements that all agree on. You should be able to rely on the care. It is important with health care. “
“Through these phrases, she has taken the lead in the vårdfrågan, but really we do not know a smack on her policy.”
“Perhaps we will know more about the policy in the future. To the top positions has återrekryterats a couple of opinion leaders that tend to speak out of the beard. Johan Ingerö lamented how Olof Palme ”socialized health care”, a concept that Trump and other republicans usually use to warn of the democrats who want to make us care a bit more person. Per Gudmundson speaks warmly to ”not only allow, but also to affirm the emergence of private supplement, funded by the individual”.”
“In a sugababes lot of years have KD just bejakat the development towards a more unequal healthcare through increased semi-private funding. In his capacity as the minister of social affairs rev Göran Hägglund immediately up the stopplag that would prevent the fast tracks, which is a natural feature of the Swedish health care.”
“thus, We have received lots of clinics with two queues to their receptions, a snabbkö for insurance customers and a slow for all the others. There are even hospitals that recruit specialists from the public to the departments as to shut out the public-funded patients.”
“In riksdagsdebatterna managed the jovialiske Hägglund with the trick to be opposed to the fast tracks in health care, at the same time that he opposed any attempts to restrict their distribution.”
“It does not go together. It is a hypocritical.”
“In a similar way, it relates in the day. KD prides itself on ”health and medical services to be jointly financed and demand-driven” and at the same time weakens the party these load-bearing elements of the Swedish welfare model.”
“An example is the new law on personal income tax of private health insurance policies, a small but fundamentally important step to counter the further americanisation of Swedish health care. “
“KD is rock-hard opponents of the law. So says the above mentioned Gudmundson that the state straffbeskattar the individual must pay a third time for the same welfare services”, while the Ingerö draws that we, the citizens, to be treated as an ”economic Särimner, who can both double – and trippelbeskattas for one and the same service”.”
“In its zeal to promote the ”private” insurance expects Gudmundson and Ingerö wrong. What the law means is that the policyholders are now paying a larger share of their insurance out of their own pocket, that is to say that the taxpayer will not sponsor them quite as much as in the past. “
“With the new law, those who choose to take out insurance to pay, within two (definitely not three) times for health care.”
“in Order to promote the private healthcare system is required, the excesses and myths of various types, preferably such as will cause us to lose all confidence in the solidarity-based financing, which the KD at the same time claiming to protect. “
“It is Gudmundsons and Ingerös paradgren. Gudmundson judge the public health system altogether and Ingerö mean, in a hard to match sentence about it in the international comparison, after all, relatively well-functioning Swedish health care, that ”It is almost fifty years since Olof Palme socialized healthcare, but the disastrous outcome haunts us today”.”
“KD says one thing and mean another, or vice versa. KD is a conservative party that seems to radical changes. It is high time to call Ebba Busch Thor and her hypocritical policy.”
“nJohn Lapidus, phd in economic history and author of the book ”Vårdstölden””
“n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook.”
