“To take away from a person with a prosthetic leg not only means that the person’s mobility and freedom of movement is hampered and limited, but also constitute a significant interference in the person’s integrity,” writes JO according to Swedish radio P4 Västerbotten.
the Police have in their opinion said that the prosthesis was stripped of the man, after conferring with the doctor and the fear that it could be used as a weapon. Arrestvaktens security outweighs man’s ability to move.
JO’s criticism that the police have not done a carefully and individually considered and that the procedures have shortcomings.
“It is not sufficiently clear that there must be individual considerations.”
