Kristin Clemet said something wise. on the Political quarter. She said that if regjeringsforhandlingene to succeed, the parties must “think that you mean what you say”. After listening carefully to what the leadership in each party, you actually said , I have made a list of what may come to be the most difficult hurdles in the negotiations.
Columnist Tuftebarten .
Anonymous twitter phenomenon, frolicking in langtekst in the Newspaper. Among other things, predicted that Rosenborg are relegated in Adecco league, and that Donald Trump gets the Nobel peace Prize in 2017.
Naturally the most voltage associated with what This brings to the negotiating table. There is reason to believe that a hard-pressed Ropstad has a kravliste as long as a bad year.
The first thing he stressed during the press conference was that the Sector wanted to “create a society with room for everyone.” This can be difficult in the face of a Right who want a society with space for only some of us. The progress has gone even farther and say they do not want it to be the place to anyone at all.
The second requirement to Progress is probably also not easy. With his desire for “a lot of good family policy” is namely Kjell Britain Ropstad on a collision course with Venstreleder Trine Skei Grande, which was evident that her party wanted much bad s. She followed up by saying that if the negotiations the land of good family policy, she would in that case that it was only going to be a little bit more of it and not much as Better want.
It has stormed around the abortloven in the run up to this forhandlingsrunden, but Ropstad did not matter easier by its appearance on the Political quarter. Where notified, he also “positive changes for the people who are born, or are born”.
It is only to desire the inexperienced politician good luck with this goal in a Solberg-led government. It has long been known that the prime minister wants negative changes for us that are already born.
Erna Solberg has also other priorities that crashes with the promises made by KrFs landsmøtedelegater were lured in november. For example, said Solberg, that the parties should “find good solutions”. This has none of the other parties announced that hovedprioriteringer.
In addition, will the prime minister achieve “a result that actually makes Norway better in the years to come”. Then she must in that case convince the parties both to the right and left, since these want to make the Uk worse in the years to come.
The other parties have also their claims. Progress party’s Siv Jensen told that her party will require “improvements of the sector”. This seems the most like a game for the gallery, all the time the other three parties have programfestet deterioration of the sector.
finally, we have Left and the party leader Trine Skei Grande, who marked him with perhaps the most unrealistic forhandlingsposisjonen during the press conference. Grande took the bet and told that the Left wants to “change Norway in a positive way” while the other partilederne looked sheepishly down at the ground.
This requirement will probably Erna make sure to clean off the table early in the negotiations. The other three parties have after all said they want to readjust Norway in a negative way, and cannot afford to go on a defeat in this question.
Tell me which Norwegian artist you like the best, and I will tell you who you are, Columnist
