TRONDHEIM/OSLO: It is entered into settlement, in the case of Kåre Ingebrigtsen, Erik Hoftun and Rosenborg.
the Settlement should have been concluded at. 08.15 Wednesday morning. It reports NRK.
the Start of today’s trial was postponed to at 10, without given any reason from the court about the delay. It was the first sign that the parties are now discussing a settlement.
Ivar Koteng, says to NRK Wednesday morning that there were several conversations between the lawyers to the defendants the football club and the lawyers to the former coaches on Tuesday afternoon and evening.
On the question of whether it means that it goes against the settlement he answers:
– I don’t know. There is a lot of male fordummende testestoron here, ” said Koteng to NRK.
VIEW FROM the RIGHT: Ivar Koteng be asked what thoughts he does around the way Bill Ingebrigtsen and Erik Hoftun got fired on. Show more Asked the parties to discuss
It was at the end of the rettsdagen yesterday that judge Anne Marie Selvaag took recommended the two parties to try to find an amicable solution.
the Parties ‘ lawyers promised to contact with each other after rettsdagen was over to see if it was possible to come to a settlement both parties were happy with.
Ingebrigtsen and Hoftuns lawyers, Stone Kimsås-Otterbech and Andreas Spots, yesterday was clear that it was Rosenborg who had come to them with an offer.
RBK won budkampen on the Hill Demanded ten million
Ingebrigtsen was fired Thursday 19. July of last year. So did assistant Erik Hoftun (49), who was also a part of the action. The rationale for the board chairman Ivar Koteng was the following:
We are looking for what can be done better, and we believe we have taken out the potential of the Bill.
Spoken with believed the removal was wrongful. In sivilrettssaken framsatte he a claim of ten million, as he considered the lost base salary and bonus up to 31. December 2020. It was when the contract went out.
Stridens core was the interpretation of the term “business leader”. Rosenborg thought Ingebrigtsen was there, and that he thus had disclaimed himself stillingsvernet after the working environment act. The club therefore believed it was in his full right to ask him to go on the day.
Ingebrigtsen and his attorney – Stone Kimsås-Otterbech – believed, however, that he was not a “business leader”, and that the clause did not apply.
The citation said, among other things:
– Ingebrigtsens responsibility was limited to exercise and be athletic responsible for the A team. Decisions about the purchase and sale of players had to be taken in conjunction with the athletic director and the board of directors. The general manager or the board of directors should always approve the budget appropriation. It is on this background, it is obvious that the Spoken was not the “supreme leader” for RBK.
This has been one of the most important points that have come up through the first two rettsdagene where Ingebrigtsens lawyer has asked the chief executive and the sporting director’s role, set against hovedtreneren.
the Case is updated.
“Perry” responds to Spoken-telephone