“Five answers on the suspect myglet”

“”Matchfixning? I have two things to say…””

“Ingvild Flugstad Østberg was accused of losing on purpose against the friend Therese Johaug.”

“Now responds to her suspicions.”

“– It’s not about that, ” she says.”

“Claims and Johaugs close friendship at the side of the tracks became the subject of discussion in the weekend when the Norwegian experts targeted the suspicion that She lost a spurt fight against Johaug with diligence.”

“She had, as expected, secured the victory in the overall world cup title, and saw in addition to be able to finish it in style by coming in second (behind Stina Nilsson) in the season’s last race. But just before the finish line, she was nedspurtad of Johaug, who thus climbed from a fourth – to third place in the total.”

“the Question is whether she did it on purpose?”

” I didn’t know it until now, claimed Johaug.”

” I am quite sure that they knew the conditions. I have seen Ingvild sprint better than what she did today, ” said Aukland.”

“He was backed up by TV2’s Petter Soleng Skinstad.”

“”of Course, the Norwegian längdåkare accused of something that is closest to can be likened to matchfixning. In my eyes the Norwegian cross-country skiing scored undeserved much criticism in recent years, but much of it has actually been self-inflicted. Then, it is perhaps not undeserved, either,” he wrote.”

“Now commenting that She suspected for the first time.”

” I have noted there has been discussions about this and I have two things to say: one is that Therese had won the where the spurt regardless. It was not ”a gift” from me. The second is that when the guys work together and help each other so they become geniförklarade, but if we do it – which we did not make it this time – so equated it with matchfixning… “she says to PLEASE”